On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as>wrote:
> Sebastian, > > I'm not sure that talking about frameworks is the best way to attract new > developers. I think some code samples that show how easy it is to do > fairly complicated tasks may be better. Think of what the > Adobe Evangelists have shown in the past (demoware). Flex is pretty > awesome in the fact that you don't really need a framework to do most basic > functions -- it is a framework in itself (and it allows the developer to > explore the framework without having to worry about the black-magic that is > Framework X vs. Framework Y). > > Showing new users code patterns without involving frameworks would be very > useful. For example, showing how certain code patterns can help leverage > Events properly, etc. > > -Nick > Right. The only framework we need to talk about is the Flex framework. Examples for integrating it with other microarchitectures can be taken care of those respective projects. By talking about third-party microarchitectures we would seem like we prefer any particular one(s) Our examples should talk in terms of just ActionScript and MXML. You can implement MVC in Flex without having to use any other framework. Thanks, Om
