Alex, I played around with MXML in FalconJx a bit. There is already rudimentary support implemented. From my quick glance it looks like we need Mike for this, as he set the wheels in motion and is most familiar with the approach chosen for FalconJx::MXML. Mike has indicated that he is currently working on other projects and will finish the AMD parser first, before returning to MXML.
Maybe is we ask him nicely he'd be willing to take MXML support just a little further, just enough to support FlexJS? If FlexJS development uses FalconJx, I can much more easily contribute (port FlexJS to a full 'goog' approach) and all our efforts will be made on the same code base, which can only speed up work on ASJS. Mike, pretty please? ;-) EdB On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > Falcons already called closure compiler. I just moved where it was called and > got it to handle multiple files. > > We need to get jx to handle mxml in order to switch. Do you have time for > that? I want to get basic css working and do some as refactoring first. > > > Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone. > > Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > > Alex, > > From your latest commit, it looks like we're doing a lot of work > twice. I finished the inclusion of the GCC (incl. deps etc.) into > FalconJx a couple of weeks ago. > > I have some cycles open in the near future. What do you think, time to > move FlexJS from FalconJS to FalconJx? > > EdB > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
