I can confirm that core.swc in 4.9 is indeed 47 kb on my machine as well. Whereas core.swc in 4.8 is 107 kb.
Om On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > Crap, that's a bug. Please file an issue for it and we'll deal with it in > the next release. You can use the 4.8 version as you have found or add > framework.swc to your library list. > > > On 3/3/13 8:33 PM, "Federico Jakimowicz" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Alex, Well I have the core.swc, however the flex 4.9 core.swc is a > 47kb > > file while flex 4.8 core.swc is a 107kb one. > > I guess then something is missing (at least mx.core.BitmapAsset and > > ByteArrayAsset), isn't it?. After replacing 4.9's swc with the 4.8 one > the > > project compiled and ran successfully.Do you think this is an error > specific > > of my Apache Flex 4.9 installation or something more general?(I used the > flex > > 4.9 sdk installer to install it) thanks for your kind help, Fede.> From: > > [email protected] > >> To: [email protected] > >> Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 20:19:53 -0800 > >> Subject: Re: Errors BitmapAsset & ByteArrayAsset missing Flex 4.9 > >> > >> Do you have a core.swc in frameworks/libs? > >> > >> > >> On 3/3/13 8:02 PM, "Federico Jakimowicz" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi! I'm building a "hello world" project using Starling and Feathers. > When > >>> using sdk version Apache Flex 4.9 FP11.1 I get the following errors: > 1017: > >>> The > >>> definition of base class BitmapAsset was not found.1017: The > definition of > >>> base class ByteArrayAsset was not found. However this errors don't > appear > >>> using sdk version Apache Flex 4.8.Any ideas what might be going on? > kind > >>> regards > >> > >> -- > >> Alex Harui > >> Flex SDK Team > >> Adobe Systems, Inc. > >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >> > > > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >
