If you only want the jar and not run tests, I thought there was a sub-task
you could run.


On 3/17/13 7:59 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <apa...@teotigraphix.com> wrote:

> Here is a stack trace when running the build of compiler.tests
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     [junit] 2086 bytes written to
> C:\Users\Work\Documents\git-apache\flex-falcon\compiler.tests\temp\MXMLPropert
> yStringTests1425684253960474506.swf in 0.305
> seconds
>      [junit] java.io.IOException: Cannot run program
> "C:\Users\Work\Documents\git-apache\flex-falcon\compiler.tests\temp\FlashPlaye
> r.exe": CreateProcess error=2, The system cannot find the file
> specified
>      [junit]  at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:460)
>      [junit]  at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Runtime.java:593)
>      [junit]  at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Runtime.java:466)
>      [junit]  at mxml.tags.MXMLFeatureTestsBase.compileAndRun(Unknown Source)
>      [junit]  at 
> properties.MXMLPropertyStringTests.MXMLPropertyStringTests_tag_text(Unknown
> Source)
>      [junit]  at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>      [junit]  at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>      [junit]  at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.j
> ava:25)
>      [junit]  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.ja
> va:45)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.jav
> a:15)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java
> :42)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:
> 20)
>      [junit]  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:
> 68)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:
> 47)
>      [junit]  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
>      [junit]  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
>      [junit]  at 
> junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter.run(JUnit4TestAdapter.java:39)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUnitTestRunn
> er.java:518)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.launch(JUnitTestR
> unner.java:1052)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRun
> ner.java:879)
>      [junit] Caused by: java.io.IOException: CreateProcess error=2,
> The system cannot find the file specified
>      [junit]  at java.lang.ProcessImpl.create(Native Method)
>      [junit]  at java.lang.ProcessImpl.<init>(ProcessImpl.java:81)
>      [junit]  at java.lang.ProcessImpl.start(ProcessImpl.java:30)
>      [junit]  at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:453)
>      [junit]  ... 25 more
>      [junit] java.io.IOException: Cannot run program
> "C:\Users\Work\Documents\git-apache\flex-falcon\compiler.tests\temp\FlashPlaye
> r.exe": CreateProcess error=2, The system cannot find the file
> specified
>      [junit] 2098 bytes written to
> C:\Users\Work\Documents\git-apache\flex-falcon\compiler.tests\temp\MXMLPropert
> yStringTests5287004435668676379.swf in 0.356
> seconds
>      [junit]  at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:460)
>      [junit]  at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Runtime.java:593)
>      [junit]  at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Runtime.java:466)
>      [junit]  at mxml.tags.MXMLFeatureTestsBase.compileAndRun(Unknown Source)
>      [junit]  at 
> properties.MXMLPropertyStringTests.MXMLPropertyStringTests_tag_tag(Unknown
> Source)
>      [junit]  at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>      [junit]  at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>      [junit]  at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.j
> ava:25)
>      [junit]  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.ja
> va:45)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.jav
> a:15)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java
> :42)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:
> 20)
>      [junit]  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:
> 68)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:
> 47)
>      [junit]  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
>      [junit]  at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
>      [junit]  at 
> junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter.run(JUnit4TestAdapter.java:39)
>      [junit]  at 
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUnitTestRunn
> er.java:518)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Quoting Michael Schmalle <apa...@teotigraphix.com>:
> 
>> On this note;
>> 
>> I have done my duty...
>> 
>> I can confirm all tests pass int eh falcon.jx.tests except the 4
>> that depend on flexjs.
>> 
>> So I'm good to go other than the text layout barf.
>> 
>> Falcon was successfully built as well after my half ass attempt at the sdk.
>> 
>> All the tests that don't depend on swfs passed for falcon but the
>> rest did a horrible death with file not found. Not going to worry
>> about this. I don't understand how this stuff messes up if the build
>> files are correct.
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
>> Quoting Michael Schmalle <apa...@teotigraphix.com>:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Hey,
>>> 
>>> I have managed to build Falcon after a half ass attempt to build
>>> the sdk, which failed at text layout or something, don't know the
>>> build went for 45 minutes then died, looks like it built most.
>>> 
>>> But for falcon, we still have;
>>> 
>>> <property name="sdk.branch"
>>> value="${compiler}/../../../sdk/branches/develop"/>
>>> 
>>> I had to change it to;
>>> 
>>> <property name="sdk.branch" value="${compiler}/../../flex-sdk"/>
>>> 
>>> I have all the repos side by side, Erik how did you get all this
>>> stuff to build? Did you recreate the old directory structure?
>>> 
>>> These build files are way to brittle for my taste.
>>> 
>>> Mike
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com
>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
>> http://www.teotigraphix.com
>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>> 
>> 

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Reply via email to