That's problem is solved by applying this policy naming: master develop whiteboard/fthomas whiteboard/cdutz whiteboard/mclean feature/add-maven-descriptor feature/add-installer-fp-download feature/add-fp-download bug/jira-#2342
... using nominal branches, which are structured to manage virtual folders -- Jose Barragan Chief Software Architect Codeoscopic Madrid C/. Infanta Mercedes, 92. Planta 5. 505. 28020 Madrid. Tel.: +34 912 94 80 80 On Mar 18, 2013, at 2:21 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> can really get quickly messy, I wouldn't take this risk. > > Again, if folks have several projects and those projects several branches as > it common using GIT, without strict maming convention, the list of the > branches which can grow a lot will mess the people to retreive even their own > branch, imagine : > > fthomas > cdutz > mclean > feature_add_maven_descriptor > feature_add_installer_fp_download > feature_add_fp_download > > Can you say for sure from those branches, which ones goes with which > user/project ? > >> Why is this a better option? > > each one got its own space and can do whatever he wants. > >> I could live with leaving the whiteboard in SVN. > > Me too. > > -Fred > > -----Message d'origine----- From: Om > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 2:06 AM > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: Committers - preparing for Git > > On Mar 17, 2013 5:56 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I agree with you Justin, each persons branch is a bad pratice, the repo > can really get quickly messy, I wouldn't take this risk. > > Describe 'messy', please. I am not sure what the concern is. > >> Maybe one repo by person is not feasible, how do we know without asking ? > > Why is this a better option? > >> If it's not feasible, I would stay in SVN too and if I really want to > work with GIT, I would use git-svn clone, it takes a bit of time to setup > but once done, it works like a charm. >> > > I could live with leaving the whiteboard in SVN. > > This is probably why no other project has whiteboards in git. > > Thanks, > Om > >> >> -Fred >> >> -----Message d'origine----- From: Justin Mclean >> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 1:12 AM >> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Committers - preparing for Git >> >> Hi, >> >>> I vote for creating a branch for each committer under whiteboard. Anyone >>> else want to chime in? >> >> By branch I assume you mean repo not sure if everyone having their own > branch make sense as each persons branch would contain different files etc > etc. >> >> But currently using git for the white board area is basically unusable > (unless you have high speed access) , so we either keep it in SVN or create > repo for each committer however I'm not sure Infra would go for that second > option. >> >> Justin >
