use git branch --all to see local and remote branches, local branches are
created at checkout time.
-Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 7:21 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: I'm confused about local vs. remote branches
You seem to be right. I tried 'git checkout develop' and it switched to that
branch. Afterwards 'git branch' showed
*develop
master
So now that I have two local branches, will 'git pull' update both of them,
or only the current branch?
- Gordon
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 11:00 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: I'm confused about local vs. remote branches
The way I understand it, if you do "git checkout develop", it will give you
a local copy of the develop branch that tracks 'origin/develop'… but I'm
also just learning git, so please correct me if I'm explaining this wrong.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl (http://www.ixsoftware.nl)
On Monday, March 18, 2013 at 18:52, Gordon Smith wrote:
I've cloned the flex-sdk repo. When I do 'git branch' all I see is
* master
but when I do 'git branch -a' I see
* master
remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
remotes/origin/develop
remotes/origin/patches
remotes/origin/release4.9
I'm not clear on how to read this, but it looks like the remote repo has a
develop branch but my local repo doesn't. Does that mean I can't do 'git
checkout develop'?
- Gordon
