Github definitely simplifies things. Are there any advantages to keeping 
content on Apache's domain?

Harbs

On Apr 4, 2013, at 8:44 PM, Om wrote:

> Any more thoughts on how to manage the whiteboard repo?  If its okay with
> everyone, I will go ahead and start a VOTE thread soon.
> 
> Personally, I like the option of working on GitHub for the whiteboard.  In
> a way it levels the playing field of committer vs. non-committer.  This
> could foster more community involvement.  Going back to my first days of
> contributing to Apache Flex, I did all my Installer related work on GitHub
> and just posted the link on the dev forum here.  After a lot of discussion,
> Justin (who was a committer by then) and a couple of non-committers forked
> my project and started sending me Pull requests.  This gave me a more
> flexibility in how I contributed as a non-committer.  The fork that Justin
> did on GitHub can be considered as a whiteboard area, except that it let
> him foster community participation (like me and the other non-committers)
> 
> And of course, working with GitHub is a breeze.  Once you create your own
> space, you can create unlimited projects and branches.
> 
> Thanks,
> Om
> 
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
>> The way I see it:
>> 
>> #1 Pros:  Uses Git.  Therefore you only need to know one SCM.  Any work
>> with
>> a rich branching history retains that history when landing in the main
>> repos.
>> #1 Cons:  240MB initial download.  It took several hours for some folks.
>> 
>> #2 Pros:  Not sure.
>> #2 Cons:  I think it would be hard to switch between branches when you have
>> changes pending if you want to help out on someone else's whiteboard?  Fred
>> seemed to have other concerns.
>> 
>> #3 Pros:  Much easier to set up repos, I think.
>> #3 Cons:  Unclear about Apache approval.  Have to be careful about who else
>> contributes to your code.
>> 
>> #4 Pros:  Smaller initial download
>> #4 Cons:  Might be more work to transfer source from SVN to Git with
>> history?
>> 
>> For me, retaining history is way more important than waiting 2.5 hours once
>> for the initial download.
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/21/13 1:34 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Sorry, I have not been tracking the votes. Let me start up a new vote
>> with
>>> these options:
>>> 
>>> ===================================
>>> What to do with Whiteboard?
>>> 
>>>   1. Use the sparse checkout option as described here (
>>>   http://markmail.org/message/dg7hplezkzwiroes)
>>>   2. Create a branch per user in the whiteboard
>>>   3. Move to github for whiteboards
>>>   4. Let whiteboards remain in SVN
>>> 
>>> ===================================
>>> 
>>> If there are more options, please add it to the discussion here.  I will
>>> give some time for discussion before starting an official VOTE thread.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Om
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
>>> <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Om,
>>>> 
>>>> Btw, I remove my vote of 3.1 and give my +1 to the 3.4 (stay on svn),
>>>> that's a lazy vote, I can change my mind ?
>>>> 
>>>> -Fred
>>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to