Hi, > Ok so while I have been working my new feature through a discussion, I > wanted to capture our rough process [1] which I have added to a wiki page. Looks good so far. Only issue I have is when a new feature is a change to an existing one - IMO it's more important to see how the code has changed not the full code.
We probably need to add something about the files having apache licences and be able to be licensed. > -Is there going to be some sort of sign the feature add can be added to the > sdk... e.g. [poll], [vote], or some duration of time that has passed? Depends on how big the changes is, if it's an addition, does it change existing behaviour etc etc In most cases for small changes and additions it's commit then review but nice to discuss on list first. > -How do we keep track of new features that have been added? Used primarily > for when a new release comes out. JIRA and/svn it's mostly a manual process to convert that to the new release notes. Thanks, Justin
