ok, did you compile the all test at least once and ran mustella db ?
one more point, if there is a space as a first char of the output lines,
they should be remove before you can use them as the chooser input.
-Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 4:22 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
I don't think that is working as expected... I'll play around a bit more
with it, though...
Might be because I'm on Windows...
-Nick
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
<webdoubl...@hotmail.com>wrote:
For the MustellaTestChooser, use as input, the output of: git status -s |
grep "^[A M]"
-Fred
-----Message d'origine----- From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 2:23 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Been out of the loop -- looking to catch up
Hey everybody!
I've been out of the loop for the last three weeks or so. Life has gotten
in the way.
Anyway, I have a few questions :
- Has MustellaTestChooser been updated to use output from GIT? Been
working on a few different bugs and I'm getting tired of waiting for all
the tests to run ;P
- What is the status of the Whiteboard stuff? I have a few updates I
wanted to make to one of the components I was working on.... I'm assuming
this is still on SVN for the time being?
- I have Tour de Flex from Adobe ready to donate (been sitting on it for a
few weeks, actually. I've brought it up to date from the last version
Adobe published) . Where do we want this to appear? I'm assuming we
will
be hosting a copy on the website, but I'm not sure if we want to hosting
the source code elsewhere as well... I'd imagine that a good place for it
would be the whiteboard because I don't see it needing its own GIT repo...
- I noticed a requirement for the TLF_HOME variable so that the framework
to be compiled, but I didn't see it documented anywhere. Is somebody
working on the documentation to include that?
- From what I've been seeing, people have been fixing bugs in develop....
yet I see a few branches for specific bug fixes. What standard should I
be following going forward?
Thanks!
-Nick
