On 5/29/13 3:20 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Justin Mclean ><jus...@classsoftware.com>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> > We should release it along with the next SDK release, IMO. >> >> There noting dependant on the new SDK and selecting the Air/FP version >>is >> useful to people now. There needs to be a separate release/vote cycle >>for >> it so it may be hard to release them both at exactly the same time. >> >> Thanks, >> Justin > > >The flex-sdk release generates a lot of buzz. The Installer can benefit >from that kind of buzz. It does not make sense to repeat the marketing >efforts if we are going to release 4.10 in short order. > >Also, the last time we released the Installer, there was general confusion >with people thinking that we are releasing a new version of the SDK. We >should try to release new versions of the sdk and the installer as much as >possible. IIRC, there is some reason we can't release them together. Isn't it that the Installer can't be certified to install the latest SDK until we put the SDK in its final URL? I think in the past we release the SDK then start futzing with the Installer and several days/weeks go by. What would it take for us to feel good about releasing the Installer the same day or next day after an SDK release? > >Thanks, >Om
