Igor, you are free to vote however you want, but nowhere in the proposal does it say that Flex SDK users will be forced to use Swiz.
Thanks, Om On Jun 3, 2013 8:30 AM, "Igor Costa" <igorco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've explained in my previous e-mail, why I vote -1 (binding). > > > Maybe you missed the e-mail on previous thread. But here's the mention. > > A year back, someone at Flex Brazil group asked me why we couldn't simple > > have a MVC approach into the SDK. > > My short answer was We prefer you decide which way you want to code, > > rather than force you on our perspective way. > > For mature and freedom of choice we should not have such only a way of > > coding, like explicit someone to code on that specific way. > > We have a plethora of Flex frameworks out there, if we include one, we > > should include all of it. > > For the freedom of choice that's why I voted -1. > > > ---------------------------- > Igor Costa > www.igorcosta.com > www.igorcosta.org > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Dasa Paddock <dpadd...@esri.com> wrote: > > > +1 (non binding) > >
