Oh, and in my enthusiasm I forget an obvious resource: the commits@
mailing list. It receives notifications of all the commits made to all
Apache Flex repos.

Send an email to 'commits-subscr...@flex.apache.org' and join the fun.

EdB



On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> Terry,
>
>> A.  Where in the downloadable files is a version of Falcon that can be used
>> to compile an mxml file?
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by downloadable files. There hasn't been a
> release of Falcon yet, so there are no source or binary releases. You
> can get the source from git and build the compiler yourself, there is
> even a halfway decent README that should help you get started.
>
>> B.  Where can I register to receive nightly updates showing which tests of
>> the Falcon compiler have succeeded and which have failed in compiling an
>> mxml file in the appropriate Jenkins runs?
>
> You don't have to register. Like everything else in Open Source and
> especially with Apache.org, you can see for yourself, it's all
> available publicly:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/flex-falcon/
>
>> C.  Where can I register to receive notification of each checkin showing
>> changes to the Falcon compiler project.
>
> Again, no registration needed. You can create a clone of the git repo
> with this command:
>
> git clone https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon.git flex-falcon
>
> This clone will have the full history of the development of the Falcon
> and FalconJx compilers readily available for your perusal. Do a simple
> git pull when you want to check the most recent updates.
>
> HTH,
>
> EdB
>
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> Terry,
>>>
>>> I don't see where your fear and anger is coming from. The release
>>> we're currently working on is purely the Flex SDK; all the
>>> improvements and fixes are for SWF output, JavaScript is not even an
>>> option.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, the work on FlexJS is a separate stream in the project. And
>>> even FlexJS will offer the usual SWF output, while ADDING the extra
>>> option of 'web native' output as a release build.
>>>
>>> The Falcon compiler is a fork of the ASC 2.0 compiler and will,
>>> together with FalconJx, one day replace the 'old' compiler. More
>>> importantly, and what you apparently haven't realised yet, is that the
>>> FalconJx cross compiler that's at the core of FlexJS relies heavily on
>>> the Falcon compiler. That means, there will be no full FlexJS release
>>> WITHOUT a 'completed' Falcon compiler. So, instead of diverting
>>> resources away from the pure SDK, FlexJS is actually helping to move
>>> the entire project to meet your 'demands'.
>>>
>>> Please stop with the FUD and help us make Apache Flex an even greater tool.
>>>
>>> If you want to contribute to the continued support and improvement of
>>> the Flex SDK, you can either use the new version of the Installer
>>> (currently a Release Candidate) to download and install the SDK to
>>> your IDE, or download one the nightly builds from:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/flex-sdk_release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/
>>>
>>> and work from the command line. Any input you can give the project is
>>> much appreciated!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> EdB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Terry Corbet <terry.cor...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > First, it has only been necessary to make such demands because there has
>>> > been no championing of this task amongst the primary movers of the Flex
>>> > Apache project.  I applaud every improvement, every success that Alex has
>>> > in meeting his objective with his unidentified in house customer who what
>>> > been driving the allocation of efforts towards their goal, but their goal
>>> > was not the primary goal of picking up the support of Flex by the
>>> > community.  If you step back and take a hard, objective look at the very
>>> > facts motivated by your marketing person's asking for answers to the
>>> > business-making decisions that will be made concerning whether or not to
>>> > invest in the framework, you will notice that there really are no strong
>>> > motivators amongst the thousands of hours you have all spent in turning
>>> out
>>> > the remarkable 4.10 release.
>>> >
>>> > I'm sorry, I know that hurts, but the fact of the matter is that the only
>>> > reason I have to deciding to compile with 4.10 plus 3.8 instead of 4.6
>>> plus
>>> > 3.8 is to help you debug/quality-assure the release.  That's an
>>> investment
>>> > to help the community, not my in house customers.  For my own set of
>>> needs
>>> > every single advancement is attributable to enhancements in the
>>> underlying
>>> > Adobe engines from the time of the Flex divestiture.  It is what is in
>>> > 11.6, 11.7, 11.8, what is in 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, that I am able to provide a
>>> > richer solution today than a year ago.
>>> >
>>> > That in no way diminishes the importance of what you have accomplished
>>> but
>>> > if it does not make the point that moving from an application framework
>>> > that runs atop the two Adobe virtual machines of Flash Player and AIR to
>>> > one that will run atop whomevers browser is completely uninteresting to
>>> > some of us invested in Flex for large, complex, compute-intensive,
>>> desktop
>>> > applications, I don't know what else to say.  I hope that running in
>>> > browsers will make tons of folks happy, all I want is that someone be
>>> > concerned about making sure that running on desktops and tablets be the
>>> > best that it can be.
>>> >
>>> > Second, what I will contribute is daily testing of Falcon against the
>>> needs
>>> > of those kinds of applications.
>>> >
>>> > Third, since I do not have the resources you have at your disposal,
>>> cannot
>>> > compile the framework, please instruct me on where I can download
>>> whatever
>>> > set of binaries and any contingent libraries will allow me, just from
>>> some
>>> > simple command line environment to invoke the equivalent of amxmlc
>>> some.as
>>> > or amxmlc some.mxml and get a swf file that can be run with adl to give
>>> you
>>> > feedback.
>>> >
>>> > Fourth, I am signed up for all the lists of which I am aware, please tell
>>> > me where I can watch the nightly progress of Gordon's latest tests
>>> against
>>> > whatever set of bugs he is working his way through.  If such a list had
>>> > ever been published, it would have been possible to construct some test
>>> > cases to go against whatever remaining, corner conditions have prevented
>>> > your being able to include the Falcon compiler in your 4.10 release.  It
>>> is
>>> > clear that you ahve such a prioritized list that has helped the wonderful
>>> > progress with FalconJX and the JavaScript world.  With some visibility to
>>> > your process we ought to be able to surpass that rate of success in
>>> getting
>>> > Falcon for Flex out the door.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Ok, Terry, you made your wishes (dare I say demands?) clear. Now I ask
>>> >> you this: how are YOU going to contribute to make this happen?
>>> >>
>>> >> EdB
>>> >>
>>> >> PS. the Jenkins 'flex-falcon' job has been running nightly for more
>>> >> than 2 months now, successfully building and testing both Falcon and
>>> >> FalconJx...
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:35 PM, J. Terry Corbet (JIRA)
>>> >> <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >> > J. Terry Corbet created FLEX-33634:
>>> >> > --------------------------------------
>>> >> >
>>> >> >              Summary: Flex-Falcon
>>> >> >                  Key: FLEX-33634
>>> >> >                  URL:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33634
>>> >> >              Project: Apache Flex
>>> >> >           Issue Type: Wish
>>> >> >           Components: Performance: Compiler
>>> >> >     Affects Versions: Apache Flex 4.11.0
>>> >> >          Environment: The Desktop and the Tablet.
>>> >> >             Reporter: J. Terry Corbet
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > If this is not the right place for this request, please tell me where
>>> to
>>> >> make it.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Alex says that the Falcon Compiler is successfully handling some large
>>> >> test case he has.  The notes on the Git page say that it is 'almost
>>> >> production worthy'.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > The notes I find show that Erik expressly turned off the testing of
>>> the
>>> >> compiler so that Jenkins would be clean.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > OK, you got 4.10 out the door, great job.  Now since it is a top
>>> >> priority, please
>>> >> >
>>> >> > A.  Turn on the nightly Falcon testing.
>>> >> > B.  Provide us with a nightly binary so we can help Alex test against
>>> >> our requirements.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I know that you are personally very excited about being able to get
>>> out
>>> >> from under Flex/Flash or any dependency except what a browser will
>>> provide,
>>> >> but we who have stayed with Flex for all these years are committed to
>>> >> making our applications the best possible with the Adobe Integrated
>>> >> Runtime.  Every time you successfully compile for the JS environment,
>>> >> please give us the same capability to compile for the devices on which
>>> we
>>> >> run.  If you move one step forward on being able to generate JavaScript,
>>> >> please gives us one step forward on being able to compile ActionScript.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I think any Flex 4.11 Release Candidate that does not successfully
>>> >> compile our applications with the new compiler should be voted down by
>>> all
>>> >> who own that privilege.  Move to JavaScript as fast as the wind will
>>> blow
>>> >> you there, but please stop leaving us behind.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>> >> > If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
>>> >> administrators
>>> >> > For more information on JIRA, see:
>>> >> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Ix Multimedia Software
>>> >>
>>> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>> >> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>> >>
>>> >> T. 06-51952295
>>> >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>
>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>
>>> T. 06-51952295
>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl



-- 
Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Reply via email to