Yes, I am well aware of the strictures which affect the way you use the
facilities of the Apache Software Foundation to further the cause of
producing a very useful set of software upon which thousands of us rely.  I
only tried to respond in this forum to a request for updates to your
existing release documentation, and I understand that this is not the
forum, nor the group of persons very much interested in the fact that
Apache Flex is a product.

As with any product it competes in a marketplace.  As with any such
competition, generally those who do the most professional job of promoting
their product achieve good success in gaining market share.  The folks who
labor in the product management business generally try to use the best
possible communications tools for achieving their results.

If product marketing is limited by using as your primary face to the world
a web presence maintained in the org.apache domain space, which I really
doubt, then the community ought to consider hosting its marketing presence
at other locations which do not prevent using the best possible,
multi-media, interactive tools to present their case.

The idea that you should have your hands tied by whether or not your
marketing collateral can be disseminated in an Apache Release Bundle is
simply ludicrous.  As to whether or not, in terms of being able to
cooperatively author content it is desirable that tools be readily
available to as many as who can participate, my choice of using LibreOffice
and choosing the open PDF format was not an incidental after-thought.

I'm sorry for wasting everyone's time.


On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:47 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
<bigosma...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Just to be clear, we do accept documents in PDF form, we just wont be able
> to put it in the release.  As Alex mentioned, you can attach your original
> PDF to a JIRA ticket and that would come through perfectly fine.  Also, we
> can drop the PDF file on the website and link to it from our release notes.
>
>
> As to why we cannot include the PDF in the release, the answer must be
> obvious to you by now.  It is technically a binary file (just like a
> Microsoft Word .docx file would be)  You need a special tool to open it,
> edit it, etc.  Even you could not easily extract just the text portion from
> it - and you were the author!  It is not reasonable to expect others will
> be able to do it without downloading special tools.
>
> The criteria is simple, if you cannot open a file in Notepad and edit it,
> then you have a problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Terry Corbet <terry.cor...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > It was instructive when your new marketing guru arrived and the first
> > message was "I write press releases, I don't do CSS and HTML."  I
> > understand where he is coming from, so I think there is a bigger issue by
> > which the team's interpretation of  "The Apache Way" as implying some
> sort
> > of Least Common Denominator approach has clearly been counter-productive
> to
> > your efforts.
> >
> > You guys don't really want to know that when we needed human input/output
> > for our first computers we borrowed the esteemed Model 33 Teletype from
> the
> > communications industry, so somewhere back in the fifties I still know
> > about 5-bit Baudot code that required us to insert Shift characters into
> > lines of text so that the renderer would correctly understand whether we
> > meant upper case or lower case letters following.  Not supporting
> marketing
> > tools like PDF documents is as absurd as asking me send your 5-bit text.
> >
> > So, the good news about being so old and so geeky is that I will give you
> > HTML and CSS if that is the only language you speak, but others will not.
> > In the hours since rapidly trying to author something that would be
> helpful
> > for 4.10 RC3, I could not raise the folks in Germany, where FlashDevelop
> is
> > located, but I have now sent them a summary of these threads and
> suggested
> > that they try to establish contact with the Apache Flex community
> directly.
> >
> > I am sorry for and have no idea why you would have any licensing issue
> with
> > them.  Their product is as free and as freely available as anyone's
> > definition of that term as been since Richard introduced it in the
> > eighties.  Please post to Phillippe, he is very responsive to the
> hundreds
> > of technical and non-technical postings he makes daily.
> >
> > My direct email is tcorbet DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com; please give me one
> > that I can use to send you attachments not supported by this
> > communication's vehicle.  I will see about converting the current
> document
> > to your preferred format, but, as I said, since the  window is probably
> > closed for this release, I hope you will get a much better document from
> > the folks at FlashDevelop.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Terry,
> > >
> > > It would be great if you could write up some instructions like we've
> done
> > > for the other IDEs, to match
> http://flex.apache.org/doc-getstarted.html.
> > >  My hope is to expand this tutorial one day, but my time has been split
> > > with other projects...  I don't have much experience with FlashDevelop,
> > but
> > > some licensing and installation disagreements between me and their
> > website
> > > haven't allowed me to explore it as much as I probably should.
> > >
> > > -Nick
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Terry Corbet <terry.cor...@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > I know, by reading your postings 24x7, that you never sleep
> > 'downunder',
> > > > but the FlashDevelp folks are in Europe.  So, I'll make this promise
> in
> > > San
> > > > Jose time, that I will provide instructions for FlashDevelop if I
> > cannot
> > > > get the owners of that software to do it directly by copying them on
> > this
> > > > thread when the sun comes up over there.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Justin Mclean <
> > jus...@classsoftware.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > HI,
> > > > >
> > > > > > As mentioned by others FlashDevelop not only automatically
> fetches
> > > the
> > > > > Adobe 23201B build for you
> > > > > Can you suggest some text that expands on "When using Flash develop
> > > there
> > > > > no need to package the SDK as handles that for you"?
> > > > >
> > > > > Perhaps a good idea would be to provide installation
> > > > > instructions/steps/screen cams for each of the major IDEs on the
> > Apache
> > > > > Flex websIte. Would anyone be interested in helping up with this?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Justin
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to