On Jul 25, 2013 9:26 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > On 7/25/13 8:28 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > >HI, > > > >> I received a reply from the Apache VP of Publicity about distributing > >>this as a press release on the Apache news wire. Unfortunately, > >>distribution on the news wire service is not possible because it is not > >>a major release (e.g. version N.0 or equivalent). Apache doesn't issue a > >>press releases for incremental versions. > > > >Perhaps replay back and say it certainly could be considered a major > >release and previous release was more than 6 months ago? Anyone think > >otherwise? We did have announcements for 4.8 and 4.9 so I guess the > >policy must of changed? > I think there is a difference between a press release and an announcement. > It looks like we used announce@a.o for 4.9 and 4.9.1. Wasn't our only > "press release" related to graduation? > > > > >> She also suggested sending this to annou...@apache.org in plain text > >It probably a bit long for that if you look at other announcements to > >that list, see the other thread for what I'm suggesting to post there. > > > >We could certainly put it up here on our blog > >http://blogs.apache.org/flex/ > Seems like a good idea. > > I haven't had a chance to review the document yet. My email shows that > the document was posted only about 12 hours ago. I think we should give > at least 24 hours if not 72 hours for feedback from other timezones and > folks like me who were fully occupied trying to investigate what I think > is a stop-ship bug. >
+1
