On 8/2/13 11:43 AM, "labri...@digitalprimates.net" <labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
>>I think folks may trust us by now, so it may not be worth making a >>parity release. > >Alex, > >The only counter point I offer is that, if we had a parity release with >the Apache name (or even a release that integrated some of the existing >pull requests) people might begin associating the project with this >effort and hence help me move questions and requests for help to the >Apache lists instead of the variety of other forums and locations. So, I >see there being some value in the advertisement for the point of >consolidation. Sorry, I wasn't clear. I think Apache Flex should make a release of FlexUnit, but it doesn't have to be a "parity" release. I don't know what pull requests are outstanding, so I trust your judgement on whether anything outstanding might scare folks away. If not, I don't see why the first Apache release of FlexUnit couldn't just contain those improvements. -Alex
