Thanks for the responses Chris. Yeah, FM is a beast to build. I can't say
enough "Thank Yous" for taking over the project.
So, my understanding was that FM had to be built against the version of the FDK
you wanted to use. I'm assuming this is incorrect. Has anyone tried using FM
6.0.1 with the 4.10 FDK? My only question with it having to do with the
getAdvancedTelemetry() function that I had to add to the FM source code.
As far as the RSLs, I read in the release notes that they aren't signed, and
that it only make sense to use RSLs if you are serving multiple flex
applications from the same domain... which we are. So, previously in our pom
files we had:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
<artifactId>framework</artifactId>
<version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
<type>swc</type>
<scope>caching</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
<artifactId>textLayout</artifactId>
<version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
<type>swc</type>
<scope>caching</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
<artifactId>charts</artifactId>
<version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
<type>swc</type>
<scope>caching</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
<artifactId>rpc</artifactId>
<version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
<type>swc</type>
<scope>caching</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
<artifactId>mx</artifactId>
<version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
<type>swc</type>
<scope>caching</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
<artifactId>advancedgrids</artifactId>
<version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
<type>swc</type>
<scope>caching</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
<artifactId>spark</artifactId>
<version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
<type>swc</type>
<scope>caching</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
<artifactId>sparkskins</artifactId>
<version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
<type>swc</type>
<scope>caching</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
<artifactId>spark_dmv</artifactId>
<version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
<type>swc</type>
<scope>caching</scope>
</dependency>
Currently I'm not listing any of these as dependencies in our new poms. I've
been following what I've been able to find on the web as far as standard
practices for what needs to be included in the pom files, but a lot of them
look a bit different than what we currently have in our poms. So, I'm not sure
if I still need those dependencies listed or not. If I do, would the scope be
"rsl" instead of "caching" and now look more like this?
<dependency>
<groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
<artifactId>spark_dmv</artifactId>
<version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
<type>swc</type>
<scope>rsl</scope>
</dependency>
Again, thanks everyone for the help.
Michael
From: [email protected] [via Apache Flex Development]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:00 AM
To: Scharp, Michael
Subject: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and getAdvancedTelemetry()
Yeah ... but in Flexmojos you can have a dependency of type "swc", "rsl" and
"caching". Depending on the type of dependency it loads different files from
maven "swc", "swf" or "swz". The test-cases utilizing the signed rsls have
dependencies of type "Caching" and therefore maven Looks for swz files, which
it doesn't find and therefore the build Fails, causing the testsuite to fail.
Chris
________________________________________
Von: Justin Mclean [[hidden
email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29584&i=0>]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 02:45
An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29584&i=1>
Betreff: Re: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and getAdvancedTelemetry()
Hi,
> This is because we don't have any signed RSLs (SWZ Files).
Why do you need signed files? Apache Flex does come with RSLs they are just not
signed.
Thanks,
Justin
________________________________
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29584.html
To unsubscribe from FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
getAdvancedTelemetry(), click
here<http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=29528&code=bWljaGFlbC5zY2hhcnBAZm1yLmNvbXwyOTUyOHwtMTU2NDIyNDE0NA==>.
NAML<http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29594.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
