On 9/22/13 9:53 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >> still concerned about the fix for the NumericStepper decimal places on >>Windows. >Why? It fixes the currently issue of having it default to and displaying >2 decimal places by default when users expect 0. That would be 80% (or >more at a guess) of NumericSteppers out there in the wild. The fix could >be reverted but then the release would be even more broken. It's that 80% number that worries me. The framework should be as flexible as possible and the fix you proposed makes constraints that prior versions did not have (that the number of decimal places in the step size must match the number of decimal places in the display format). Yes the user can change their code to workaround the new constraint, but it is a backward compatibility issue like the ones that burned us during 4.10.0 voting. If we revert that fix, one of us should investigate how the AdvancedStyleClient is supposed to work with the Flash globalization objects. I still think that's the right place to fix this problem. There's more details in the thread from a few weeks ago. > >> Would be nice to see if we can get the framework to compile with Falcon >> before we go out. >Added to JIRA. Do we have a list of the outstanding issues? If so can >someone add them to/add notes to: >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33770 I think Cyrill already has a bunch of issues open on Falcon and the SDK. -Alex
