Thank you Alex,
I will check it now.
Because in the 4.1.0 the tree is working without problem but after updated it
throws that error.
Thanks for the tip now i know where to look.
Miguel
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:15:42 -0700
> Subject: Re: tree error
>
> listItems is the array of renderers. In theory, every visible row should
> have at least one renderer, so listItems[rowIndex][0] cannot be null for
> any visible row.
>
> In the tree, in this code, theoretically you've clicked on the row that is
> rowIndex to close away its children so there should be a renderer.
>
> But if this code is running from a programmatic call to close a node then
> you might be catching it in some condition where in 4.10 some sizing is
> slightly different an there is no renderer at that row.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/25/13 8:54 AM, "Miguel Ferreira" <miguel.cd.ferre...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >This week i am updating the sdk for the version 4.10 i had problems
> >before but was i needed to update parsley version.
> >After that all went fine.
> >In this moment i get a error in one tree and i just don't know if is
> >related with the sdk or not.Because i have a tree working and other not.
> >Even so this error i think we could prevent it:
> >so in the component tree.as
> >on the line 1962 we have this code
> > // figure out how much space was consumed by the rows that are going
> >away for (i = rowIndex; i < rowIndex + rowsToMove && i <
> >rC; i++) { maxDist +=
> >rowInfo[i].height; // retain a reference to the rows
> >going away rowList.push({item: listItems[i][0]});
> > tmpMask = makeMask(); tmpMask.x = xx;
> > tmpMask.y = listItems[rowIndex][0].y;
> >tmpMask.width = ww; tmpMask.height = maxDist;
> > listItems[i][0].mask = tmpMask; }
> >and this line tmpMask.y = listItems[rowIndex][0].y;
> >don't have the properties we have a rowindex of one but no content for
> >that so is throwing a error of:Error #1010: A term is undefined and has
> >no properties.
> >Some ideas?
>
