On 01/10/2013 00:19, Justin Mclean wrote:
1. Voting procedure for committers
a) lazy-majority (more +1s than -1s)
I don't think this requires absolutely everyone to agree, if it doesn't
work out it's easy enough to change.
2. Voting procedure for PMC members
d) 2/3 majority (3 +1's and twice an many +1 as -1)
Much the same as committers for me, but needs to slightly stronger
because they wield more influence.
3. Voting procedure for Chair
b) lazy-consensus (no -1's)
We don't want anyone to endlessly moan they didn't vote for the chair.
4. Length of term of Chair
d) reviewed every year with option to continue
Seems the best way to not waste to much time each year.
5. Voting procedure on changing bylaws
d) 2/3 majority (3 +1's and twice an many +1 as -1)
You don't want a small number of hold outs to get in the way of changing
the important rules.
Tom
