On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Maurice Amsellem < maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote:
> >In fact, I like the mobile skin. Perhaps we can use the same skin for > desktop as well? We may want to lighten the default background color to > match that of the default >Flex spark skins, though. > > Totally agree. The desktop skin is very dull in comparison. So a lighter > mobile skin would be perfect for Desktop. > > So I will first try to merge the two host components in one, and then > "PC-ize" the mobile skin. > > Do you know if any problems aroused when working on the experimental > callout, so that I can avoid them (ie, benefit from previous experience) ? > > The experimental Callout components were created by Marcus Fritze and Maxime Cowez. There are more details in this JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33350 Hope that helps. Thanks, Om > Regards, > > Maurice > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de OmPrakash > Muppirala > Envoyé : dimanche 6 octobre 2013 20:55 > À : dev@flex.apache.org > Objet : Re: Issue with CallOut ASDOC > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Maurice Amsellem < > maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: > > > Hi Team, > > > > Actually, after looking at the experimental CallOut code, it's 95% > > similar to the original Callout. > > > > I don't know the story from the beginning, but I think it has been > > monkey-patched because the properties "actualHorizontalPosition" and > > "actualVerticalPosition" were protected, to make them accessible > > (mx_internal). > > > > So now that I know how to change and recompile the SDK :-), > > > > I just made that simple change (ie protected => mx_internal) in the > > original Callout class, and I can know use it in desktop (ie the > > callout pops up) > > > > Of course, I used a dumb Skin, to it does not look like a callout at > > all, but it should be feasible to adapt the experimental CallOutSkin > > to make it work on the original class. > > And it probably needs some more testing to make sure it works fine. > > > > So maybe we don't even need two classes, after all. > > > > After all, all other spark components (List, Panel, etc..) have the > > same hostComponent , and only differ by their skin on mobile and > > desktop platforms. > > > > What do you think? > > > > I remember that there was a discussion about this a while ago. Unsure as > to why we decided on a new component. > But I agree with you that we should merge these two components into one. > > In fact, I like the mobile skin. Perhaps we can use the same skin for > desktop as well? We may want to lighten the default background color to > match that of the default Flex spark skins, though. > > Thanks, > Om > > > > > > Maurice > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de > > OmPrakash Muppirala Envoyé : dimanche 6 octobre 2013 18:54 À : > > dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Issue with CallOut ASDOC > > > > On Oct 6, 2013 9:13 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" > > <maurice.amsel...@systar.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Team, > > > > > > I have noticed some classes asdoc link is broken on > > flex.apache.org/asdoc > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33802 > > > > > > I propose an explanation and two possible fixes , but not sure what > > > to > > do, because I don't know how the release builds are done and deployed. > > > > > > Can you please confirm/contradict the proposed explanation and which > > > fix > > should be implemented. > > > > +1 for renaming the fault class names. > > > > Thanks for catching this! > > > > Om > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Maurice Amsellem > > > SYSTAR R&D - BusinessBridgeFX > > > > > >
