It looks like the mirrors for the Flex 4.11 binaries have been propagated. I have switched the Installer 2.7 to point to the released version of 4.11. If folks who haven't voted yet can test it, that would be great.
Thanks, Om On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:16 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Maurice Amsellem < > maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: > >> > I am still having the error "Cannot delete temp directories" although >> the installation went well, and the temp/ directory is still there at the >> end of the installation. >> > (the folder was not opened in Windows Explorer, and anti-virus turned >> off). >> >> I have checked the files inside the temp folder with Unlocker.exe. >> >> They are all unlocked except "apache-flex-sdk-4.11.0-bin.zip" (locked by >> ApacheFlexInstaller), so maybe that's why the directory cannot be deleted. >> >> Maurice >> >> > Maurice, I have seen this issue on and off and have not been able to > reproduce this consistently on my machine. It might be that there is a > reference to the file held on to while unzipping it or doing an MD5 > checksum verification. > > If you can please file a JIRA ticket for it, I can take a look at it when > I have time. > > Thanks, > Om > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] >> Sent: 23 October 2013 11:29 AM >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.7 Release - RC1 >> >> Installation of SDK with Installer 2.7 RC2 went good. >> >> Because the downloads were already there, installation took only a few >> minutes! >> >> Some remarks: >> - I am still having the error "Cannot delete temp directories" although >> the installation went well, and the temp/ directory is still there at the >> end of the installation. (the folder was not opened in Windows Explorer, >> and anti-virus turned off). >> - Is there a reason for "required" options not being selected by default ? >> - On a fresh installation (nothing in the cache), the installer will take >> up to 1.4 GB of memory . I think this is because it needs to load the huge >> zip files in memory to check the MD5, but it's good to know if you have a >> small configuration. >> >> Full log: >> Version 2.7.0 (windows) >> L'URL de téléchargement du SDK à été récupéré à partir du CGI. >> AIR version 3.9 >> Flash Player version 11.9 >> Creation du dossier racine d'Apache Flex Création du répertoire >> temporaire Téléchargement d'Apache Flex SDK à partir de: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.11.0/rc2/binaries/apache-f >> lex-sdk-4.11.0-bin.zip<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.11.0/rc2/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-4.11.0-bin.zip> >> Vérification de la Signature Apache Flex SDK MD5 La Signature MD5 des >> fichiers téléchargés pour le SDK Apache Flex correspond à la référence. Le >> fichier est valide. >> Décompression: >> >> D:\ApacheFlex\dist\sdk_411_RC2\SDK_411_RC2_AIR39_3\temp\apache-flex-sdk-4.11 >> .0-bin.zip >> Décompression >> >> terminée:D:\ApacheFlex\dist\sdk_411_RC2\SDK_411_RC2_AIR39_3\temp\apache-flex >> -sdk-4.11.0-bin.zip >> Téléchargement d'Adobe AIR Runtime Kit pour Windows à partir de: >> http://airdownload.adobe.com/air/win/download/3.9/AdobeAIRSDK.zip >> Décompression: >> D:\ApacheFlex\dist\sdk_411_RC2\SDK_411_RC2_AIR39_3\temp\AdobeAIRSDK.zip >> Décompression >> >> terminée:D:\ApacheFlex\dist\sdk_411_RC2\SDK_411_RC2_AIR39_3\temp\AdobeAIRSDK >> .zip >> Installation d'Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc à partir de: >> >> http://download.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/updaters/11/playerglobal11_9 >> . >> swc >> Installation des fichiers de configuration du framework configurés pour >> être utilisés avec un IDE Téléchargement swfobject_2_2.zip de: >> http://swfobject.googlecode.com/files/ >> Téléchargement terminé >> Téléchargement OSMF.swc de: >> >> osmf.adobe/OSMF%202.0%20Release%20%28final%20source%2C%20ASDocs%2C%20pdf%20g >> uides%20and%20release%20notes%29/ >> Téléchargement afe.jar de: >> http://opensource.adobe.com/svn/opensource/flex/sdk/branches/4.y/lib/ >> Téléchargement aglj40.jar de: >> http://opensource.adobe.com/svn/opensource/flex/sdk/branches/4.y/lib/ >> Téléchargement flex-fontkit.jar de: >> http://opensource.adobe.com/svn/opensource/flex/sdk/branches/4.y/lib/ >> Téléchargement rideau.jar de: >> http://opensource.adobe.com/svn/opensource/flex/sdk/branches/4.y/lib/ >> Impossible de nettoyer les répertoires d'installation temporaires >> Installation terminée >> >> Maurice >> >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de >> OmPrakash Muppirala Envoyé : mercredi 23 octobre 2013 08:48 À : >> dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.7 >> Release - RC1 >> >> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > On 10/22/13 11:39 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> > >> > >While technically you are right, no-one uses the source distribution >> > >of the installer, so I think it is very important the binaries are >> > >tested properly. >> > I agree the new binaries need to be tested, but I don't think a new RC >> > is required, especially if you are right and folks don't use the >> > source distro. Why make the few of us who do source kit verification >> > go through all that again? Just have some folks pound on the binaries >> > and call it done when they're happy. >> > >> > >> We have the option of carrying over the votes from one RC to another. Of >> course, folks can flip their votes or chose not to vote if they dont think >> it is required (like your case where you test the source kits) >> >> Thanks, >> Om >> >> >> >> > > >> > >EdB >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> > >> IMO, if the source package is the same, a new vote is not needed. >> > >> >> > >> On 10/22/13 11:31 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> >> > >>wrote: >> > >> >> > >>>Weird. I was able to reproduce the problem on my machine. But not >> > >>>in my IDE. So, I recreated the binaries. Now the problem is gone. >> > >>>My best guess is that I built the windows binary with a stale copy >> > >>>of the codebase. >> > >>> >> > >>>Should I make a new RC2 and put up a new vote. Or should I update >> > >>>RC1 with the new binaries and ask folks to re-test? >> > >>> >> > >>>Anyone has a preference? >> > >>> >> > >>>Thanks, >> > >>>Om >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>>On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:38 AM, piotr.zarzycki >> > >>><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>>> Thanks Maurice. Now I've got correct version osmf. :) >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> ----- >> > >>>> Flex/Air developer open to new job offers and challenges. >> > >>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >> > >>>> -- >> > >>>> View this message in context: >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Apache-Fl >> > e >> > >>>>x- >> > >>>>SDK-Installer-2-7-Release-RC1-tp31365p31394.html >> > >>>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at >> > >>>>Nabble.com. >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >-- >> > >Ix Multimedia Software >> > > >> > >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> > >3521 VB Utrecht >> > > >> > >T. 06-51952295 >> > >I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> > >> > >> >> >
