On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > On 10/29/13 1:29 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > > >Well I doubt it would be possible to Setup protected Areas as this is in > >contrast to the "public-repo" idea. But I would still prefer to have the > >fdk deployed somewhere reliable. I know in our Business things Change > >quite fast I wouldn't have immagined giving up my Consultant life and > >having a full employment doing GWT stuff one year ago. But things have > >changed, dramatically reducing the amount of time I have to develop the > >next Flex Maven plugin (Sorry for that). I just want to prevent that one > >day a posting Comes to this list, that the repo is offline because of > >whatsoever reasons. As Sonatype is running Maven Central I doubt that > >they will go out of Business soon, so for me it's currently the most > >reliable place in Addition to the fact that it should work with any Maven > >Installation out of the box. > > Again, I'm out of my area of knowledge here, but is Sonatype's future > existence that much better guaranteed? Isn't there some repo on Apache > hardware where the Apache Flex bits should live? Adobe did offer to place > pom.xml files next to its downloads and I expect there to be Flash > downloads available for a long time, probably "forever". > > +1 to having the artifacts under Apache or Apache Flex control. But, http://repo.maven.apache.org/ redirects to http://search.maven.org/#browsewhich is run by Sonatype. The docs on Apache Maven recommends artifacts to be uploaded to the Central Repository. [1] Thanks, Om [1] http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html > -Alex > >
