Also, I can retrieve it at the moment but when I read the specific Air license terms, I understood it couldn't be distributed in piece but only in only one full and original distribution.
> contact an Adobe Mobile & Devices representative I guess, I will, I want to see if there is a way at Sonatype they create an Installer role with credential to meet user license agreement of the air / fp artifacts and an easy way to deploy the SDK first (indeed if they can sort out to have a distribution license first) Thanks, -Fred -----Message d'origine----- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:02 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: License Stuff I hadn't noticed that "intranet" restriction before. I would contact Adobe via the link where it says: "contact an Adobe Mobile & Devices representative". Make sure to specify that you are only looking to distribute the AIR and FP SDKs and not the runtimes (that's true, isn't it?). I would expect there are far fewer restrictions around that. -Alex On 10/29/13 1:50 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Looks like it is pretty easy to get a license. Just ask here [1] > >I meant in order to publicly distribute adobe artifacts, not only in a >closed intranet environment as mentioned, I read that document last >night and others too, I haven't see any talking about an agreement to >allow public distribution of Air / FP, from the ones I read, only Adobe >was allowed to distribute them publicly, the reason why I had liked a >pointer on a such license agreement used by Sonatype and how to get it. > >Thanks, >-Fred > >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre >2013 21:35 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: License Stuff > > > >On 10/29/13 1:23 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>Thanks for reminding me, it was completely out of my head. >> >>> I may still set up a simple "business" to distribute the same >>> package as >>Adobe 4.6 but a license acceptance will still be required which AFAIK >>still poses a problem for Maven. >> >>The acceptance can be done thru the installer which in return gives a >>credential to a Maven repo we could manage, maybe my limited company >>could manage to ask an Adobe Distribution License, what's the >>requirements >? >Looks like it is pretty easy to get a license. Just ask here [1] >> >>> Maybe we should add some license handling to Maven itself? >> >>I don't think it is possible to have an interactive process. >If Ant can ask a question, Maven should be able to as well. And if >there is a server involved, it should be able to handle registration so >you can skip the interactive dialogs. But that's just my opinion... > >> >>-Fred >[1] >http://www.adobe.com/products/players/flash-player-distribution.html >
