Alex,
Do you also see the following warning when compiling DataBindingTest to JS:
Data binding will not be able to detect assignments to 'strings'.
dataProvider="{MyModel(applicationModel).strings}" />
Just checking to make sure I have the same results as you... Also,
when I run the app (debug and release), I see the string 'undefined'
displayed several times on screen. Is that what you see as well?
EdB
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> OK, I'm all checked in. I'll post an overlay shortly. Lint away!
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 11/6/13 8:24 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
>>Ok, let's do it this way:
>>
>>You guys just keep committing (remember to pull before you push ;-))
>>and I'll fix any merge issues. Once I'm done (I think my tomorrow),
>>I'll put my changes in a new public branch, so we can test against the
>>examples to make sure I didn't break anything.
>>
>>Also, interfaces are now supported. My commit will contain several
>>'pure' JS interfaces, including ones that extend other interfaces.
>>Take a look at the "LanguageTests" example for inspiration ;-)
>>
>>I have changed the "interface" storage a bit today, instead of an
>>array just for interfaces it is now an object that can/will contain
>>info about interfaces, metadata and other class information which we
>>can easily add through FalconJx now. Be sure to update both FalconJx
>>and flex-asjs and rebuild everything.
>>
>>Alex, maybe time for a new overlay?
>>
>>EdB
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>> I haven't tried all of the example yet. Was going to do that once I
>>> finished up a wiki page and cleaned up the remaining glint issues.
>>>
>>> The discrepancy is known and it is something I have been working on
>>> recently. I haven't attempted any @interface stuff yet, so I created
>>>some
>>> base classes to mimic interfaces (e.g., org.apache.flex.core.IBeadView)
>>> but did not create one for org.apache.flex.core.IBead.
>>>
>>> --peter
>>>
>>> On 11/6/13 10:54 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I have spend the day running all JS files through JSHint and gjslint.
>>>>I fixed about 6 errors that emerged (vars not declared etc.) up, but I
>>>>also corrected all whitespace. It's a monster commit, if I get it
>>>>finished ;-)
>>>>
>>>>Another issue: there is a rather large discrepancy between the class
>>>>structure on the AS side vs. the JS side. Case in point is the lack of
>>>>an IBeads interface on the JS side. I think the idea is to make the JS
>>>>side mirror the structure of the AS side as closely as possible?
>>>>
>>>>And lastly (yeah, right... ;-)) how about the examples? Which ones are
>>>>working for you, either in debug mode or in both debug AND release
>>>>mode?
>>>>
>>>>EdB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>> I checked a number of files in yesterday and I'm pretty sure a handful
>>>>> won't pass glint right now; I meant to do them all, but forgot some so
>>>>>I'm
>>>>> doing them this morning. If you want to go ahead and run the tool just
>>>>>to
>>>>> see if and how failures pop-up, go right ahead.
>>>>>
>>>>> --peter
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/6/13 2:40 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I would like to run the entire JS framework through the 'gjslint'
>>>>>>tool. This is the JS linter provided by Google to check code that is
>>>>>>to be processed by the Closure Compiler.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It has some very strict whitespace rules, that will result in changes
>>>>>>in most files (although we started out with a clean, gjslint approved
>>>>>>version a long while ago, when I implemented 'goog' event handling).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The main advantages are that all code will be consistently formatted
>>>>>>and that it will most likely catch some annotation and related
>>>>>>errors/omissions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If no one (Alex, Peter) has commits pending, I am ready to go.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>EdB
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>--
>>>>>>Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>>>>3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>>>
>>>>>>T. 06-51952295
>>>>>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>
>>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>>3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>
>>>>T. 06-51952295
>>>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Ix Multimedia Software
>>
>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>3521 VB Utrecht
>>
>>T. 06-51952295
>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
