I've published a 'develop_strictest' branch on both the 'flex-asjs' and 'flex-falcon' projects. These need to live together to make the magic happen.
Let me know if it works for you. EdB On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:53 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Erik de Bruin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have a local branch in which I've made the FalconJx 'goog' compiler >> apply to the strictest possible rules/flags. This resulted in 193 >> warnings about bad code in the DataBindingTest example. Hidden behind >> those were some more errors ;-) >> >> I fixed all but a couple in the framework and there are some more that >> come from the example. All in all there are some 40 warnings left... >> >> The application, meanwhile, is compiled successfully and functions as >> expected. These warnings are all about annotations and types and code >> structure. >> >> I feel having the stricter compiler flags active will help us write a >> better framework. Making the remaining warnings go away is a challenge >> I gladly accept. >> >> The question is, can we live with seeing these warnings in the meantime? >> >> > I just got my DataBindingTest project up and running. I have been thinking > of ways I can help out. If no else one has objections, I can help with > this clean up of the warnings. > Maybe you can push your branch so we can work together on it? > > Thanks, > Om > > >> EdB >> >> >> >> -- >> Ix Multimedia Software >> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >> T. 06-51952295 >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
