On 11/20/13 12:43 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 19, 2013 12:51 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 11/18/13 12:19 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> >> >I'm clear. Sounds awesome! Let me know when the ant script is done, >> >I'll work it into a Jenkins job so we get a fresh overlay for each >> >commit to either Falcon(Jx) or FlexJS. Another advantage, besides >> >being always up to date, is that this way there will be a fixed URL >> >pointing to the latest and greatest overlay. >> I checked in enough ant stuff to make the 'ant release' binary package >>be >> equivalent to the FlexJSOverlay. >> >> Doing so exposed a couple of things: >> 1) FB won't accept an SDK if its version number in >> flex-sdk-description.xml is less than 4. So, I think FlexJS may have to >> start with version 4.0.0. > >That's interesting. How about the other IDEs? Should we reach out to >them? Feel free to do so. I keep hoping the IntelliJ folks would jump in. > >If we have to go this route, we could probably start it with 5.0. That >would have a nice ring to it. I guess, but my main concern is that the first release should be a 0.x to make it more clear that this is new stuff. The title in the description can say anything, just the version tag matters, AFAICT. -Alex
