Fred, this looks fine to me. I had assumed that this was going to be more of an editorial commentary. This looks like a straightforward feature comparison table. +1 from me.
Thanks for the clarification. Om On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>wrote: > Well, it was well printed, this link should work though. > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AkSnI9jZINzGdExMRlc0cTkzNWJ4UjNiWTVJM1piM3c#gid=0 > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Subject: RE: Flex and server technology > > Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:53:06 +0000 > > > > Hi, > > > > @Alex, good news :-) > > > > @Om, Not sure I follow you, could please review what I was describing > and tell me if it was what you thought ? (I hope that will be printed > correctly) > > > > > > BlazeDSLCDSGraniteDSFramework integrationSpring(1)xxEJB 3 > > > > xCDI > > > > xJPA engine supportHibernate(2)xxEclipseLink > > > > xOpenJPA > > > > xDataNucleus > > > > xMessaging (real-time)Blocking I/O http long-pollingxxxBlocking I/O http > streamingxx > > Non-blocking I/O http long-polling(3)xxNon-blocking I/O http > streaming(3)x > > RTMP > > x > > WebSocket > > > > xUDP > > > > xData managementBean validation > > > > xBig numbers > > > > xCode generation > > xxData paging > > xxData synchonization / conflict resolution > > xxDisconnected mode > > xplannedOthersMonitoring > > x > > Load testing tools(4)(4)(4)PDF generation > > x > > LicensingOpen sourcex > > xCommercial > > xx > > > > > > > > 1 - Using the project Spring-Flex2 - Partial support in Spring-Flex or > dpHibernate3 - Possible with some third party extensions4 - Supported by > NeoLoad, HP LoadRunner, IBM Rational Performance Tester > > > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 09:29:56 -0800 > > > Subject: Re: Flex and server technology > > > From: bigosma...@gmail.com > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > > > On Feb 16, 2014 3:25 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have a comparative feature table for BlazeDS / LCDS / GraniteDS, > given > > > some people are asking about it at time, do you think it is something > that > > > could fit on our wiki ? > > > > > > -1 > > > > > > If it were just a listing instead of a comparison, that would be fine. > > > > > > Given that we will be controlling BlazeDS as part of Apache Flex, it > may > > > not be fair to GraniteDS or LCDS. We should avoid even the appearance > of > > > favoritism. > > > > > > It might be better to put this up on your personal blog. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Om > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > > > >
