Hi, When I tried downloading the SDK by [RC] Installer 3 ((have configured the download cache option)), due to MD5 mismatch installation was aborted. The problem/feedback's I noticed here are,
- there is no option to retry, I have to close the app. and restart it. - even after I restart the app. since i enabled the cache, it is reusing it from the cache and aborting the installation for the same reason. (I guess app. should delete (only) the corrupted file from the cache, instead of expecting the user to delete the cache by himself.) *Regards,S. Jagan Langa* *|* *Project Manager* *Sybrant Technologies Pvt. Ltd.* *--------------------------------* Mobile: +91 98430 50897 Skype: seesamjagan -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In The Media: http://www.pr-inside.com/motorola-solutions-showcases-sybrant-s-mobile-r3745747.htm *About Sybrant:* *"Sybrant is a premier web/mobile/UIUX expert. Most admirable IT firms in India too, leverage Sybrant's expertise for their Web & UIUX needs. We are recognized for working with our clients right from the product conceptualization till the execution stage offering end-to-end solutions that sets us apart from other firms in this space. Right from developing a learning management system for a French company to helping a Non-Profit with a Mobile application till developing UX for a IT firm, Sybrant is known for delighting Customers"* -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2014-03-24 11:57 GMT+05:30 Jagan Langa Sami Durai <jaga...@sybrant.com>: > Hi All, > > Yes, I'm Aware of that Apache RSL's are not signed. But, one of our > product have 1 main application, 8 sub modules, 9 * 1 style module and 9 * > 5 resource modules. user may visit any module at any time in any locale. > and our client want to support more locale and wanted to have more > style/theme (style modules) options as user preference. and eventually that > product will grow further with new modules. So we prefer RSL instead of > binding the same core classes into all the modules and make them fat. > > Also, I'm very excited to try the latest Apache Flex Installer 3. > > > > * Regards,S. Jagan Langa* > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > 2014-03-21 19:56 GMT+05:30 Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com>: > > On 21/03/14 14:22, Alex Harui wrote: >> >>> I assume you are aware that Apache Flex RSLs are not signed and therefore >>> are really only helpful if you are deploying more than one Flex app from >>> a >>> domain. >>> >> Or if you change your core app more frequently than SDK >> >> Tom >> > >
