On 3/24/14 9:22 AM, "Michael A. Labriola" <labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
>>BTW, was one of the enhancements automated test generation? Maybe from >>metadata on the class? > >There was a bigger project on that, yes, although we didn't get >particularly far before the Apache switch so most of it was put on hold. >Also, Flash Builder would create stubs for you based on the code model it >had, so we don't go that route. I'll have to ponder whether it would be faster to manually write and maintain these tests or write a test generator. It seems like you could annotate with metadata and auto-generate a fair number of tests that way. BTW, a key motivating factor in creating a set of FlexUnit tests is to try to conform to that government standard you told me about. Do you have a 5 sentence summary of what a test suite needs to cover? Is it measured purely by code coverage or do you have to have boundary tests, negative tests, etc? -Alex
