Ended up in spam because of the zip attachment. Will try to look later. On 3/26/14 2:06 AM, "Franck Wolff" <frawo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Anyone? > > >2014-03-25 15:03 GMT+01:00 Franck Wolff <frawo...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi, >> >> Here is the page about third-party tools and solutions (I don't know if >> attached files are accepted on this mailing list, tell me). >> >> I didn't try to create any comparison table, the projects listed having >> very different scope / kind of features. Each project / tool is listed >>with >> a link and a pitch which comes from their respective websites. Many of >>them >> are outdated and inactive, many of them are certainly not compliant with >> the Apache trademark policy. >> >> I have modified a page coming from the Apache Flex website and >>integration >> should be straightforward. >> >> Franck. >> >> >> >> 2014-03-21 14:28 GMT+01:00 Franck Wolff <frawo...@gmail.com>: >> >> >>> 2014-03-20 19:16 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On 3/20/14 9:54 AM, "Franck Wolff" <frawo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >I can certainly make sure that GraniteDS website is linking back to >>>> Apache >>>> >Flex (we already do that) and following the Apache trademark policy >>>>(if >>>> I >>>> >understand what it is about ;) >>>> Sounds great. Let us know when you think you've conformed to the >>>>policy >>>> and the Apache Flex PMC will review and make suggestions if needed. >>>>And >>>> feel free to ask questions on the dev@ list if you're unsure of how to >>>> implement the policy. >>>> >>> >>> I think we already comply with the policy: we refer to either "Flex" or >>> "Apache Flex" on our website and we link to http://flex.apache.org/ on >>> our main pages. You can certainly find "Adobe Flex" in some of our old >>>blog >>> posts and documentations. I have added a notice about "Apache", "Apache >>> Flex" and "Flex" trademarks at the bottom of our site terms & >>>conditions ( >>> >>>http://www.granitedataservices.com/contact-us/site-terms-and-conditions- >>>of-use/). >>> We also have the full Apache 2 License in our distrib >>> (licenses/third-party/). >>> >>> BTW, according to this page: >>>http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/list/, >>> Flex isn't listed as a trademark of Apache but just as a project... >>> >>> Anyway, I would be happy if somebody from the Apache Flex PMC can have >>>a >>> look at our website and make sure we are not infringing any Apache >>>policy. >>> >>> >>> > >>>> >However, I can't verify that all related projects are complying to >>>>your >>>> >request and I'm certainly not the right person to ask them to do >>>>so... >>>> Right, that's the job of the PMC. We should ask each technology owner >>>> that is going to be in the list to conform before we actually put >>>>them in >>>> the list (assuming they are still active). >>>> >>> >>> I will put everything I know related to Flex in the draft, you are free >>> to remove those who don't comply with the policy. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Franck. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> -Alex >>>> >>>> >>> >>
