Hi Chris, Yes definitely, we'd love to share our Ant and Installer stuff with the rest of Apache.
-Alex On 4/15/14 6:53 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >I was simply refering to the previous post about platform independent >installer that is pretty distribution friendly (At least it should be). >I didnÄt quite grasp the original problem you were having though. > >Chris > >________________________________________ >Von: Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> >Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. April 2014 15:22 >An: dev >Betreff: Re: Be distribution friendly > >On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Christofer Dutz ><christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >> On The ApacheCon Barcamp we were discussing that some projects would >>really like to make it easier for users to install their projects. >> It seems that my comment on us having implemented an Ant based >>installer for Flex has astonished quite a lot of people. Perhaps we >>should share this feature with other Apache Projects ... there seems to >>be a demand for something like this. > >I do not understand how it is related with my demand. Care to explain. > >Thanks > >Bastien > >> Chris >> >> >> >> ________________________________________ >> Von: Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com> >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. April 2014 14:15 >> An: dev@flex.apache.org >> Betreff: Re: Be distribution friendly >> >> On 15/04/14 12:13, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >>> I plan to package flex for debian. >> Awesome ! One of the reasons I wanted to test the new Ant-based >> installer for this was it would greatly simplify doing this. >> You could potentially do what the Flash plugin installer does, and popup >> a message asking to agree to the terms. >> If the Debian package depended on ant and the JVM, then you'd be able to >> execute the install task on behalf of the user easily. >> >> Tom