Chris, You are right, I think it would be better to treat playerglobal specially, it is the NOT opensource core of Flash platform. -Gary
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > I Just had a look at the code and it seems that the hard-coded name is > only used in order to decide if the dependency is "internal". > In Flexmojos I can set scopes "internal" and "external" (I think in > Flexmojos Scopes the playerglobal should be "external"). > So I'll investigate if setting the playerglobal dependency to Mavens scope > "external" which should result in the same behaviour. > > If the playerglobal is not needed to be included in the output as the > runtime provides this, "external" seems to be exactly that and > I think providing that scope in maven is cleaner than renaming the package > and then interenally handling it differently. > > What do you think? > > Chris > > > ________________________________________ > Von: Alexander Doroshko <alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com> > Gesendet: Montag, 2. Juni 2014 10:01 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: AW: Is/Was there a requirement for the playerglobal.swc > having to be named exactly this way? > > I'm afraid hardcoded "playerglobal.swc" is still not wiped out from the > compiler sources. See > flex2.compiler.mxml.lang.StandardDefs#SWC_PLAYERGLOBAL, its usage in > flex2.compiler.CompilerSwcContext#createSource() and further usages of > flex2.compiler.Source#isInternal(). With renamed playerglobal.swc > compiler will just work incorrectly. > > On 01.06.2014 3:09, Christofer Dutz wrote: > > But if I build using maven, it shouldn't matter ... so I was wandering > why Velo implemented this extremely complicated renaming ... > > Seems to work nicely without :-) > > > > Chris > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] > > Gesendet: Samstag, 31. Mai 2014 22:15 > > An: dev@flex.apache.org > > Betreff: Re: Is/Was there a requirement for the playerglobal.swc having > to be named exactly this way? > > > > HI, > > > >> So is this now an obsolete requirement? > > As far as I aware Flash Builder expects it to be called playerglobal.swc. > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > >
