Actually, unfortunately, it seems it is the same, I still need help on it then:
[Test(async, description="Verify the Thread State sequence
New->Running->Terminated")]
public function testNewToRunningToTerminate():void {
testStateNew();
const startRunner:SequenceRunner = createStateSequenceRunner(_thread,
_thread.start, thread_stateRunning);
startRunner.run();
const terminateRunner:SequenceRunner =
createStateSequenceRunner(_thread, _thread.terminate, thread_stateTerminate);
terminateRunner.run();
}
private function createStateSequenceRunner(target:IEventDispatcher,
method:Function, assertHandler:Function, args:Array = null,
argsFunction:Function = null, timeout:int = 500):SequenceRunner {
const runner:SequenceRunner = new SequenceRunner(this);
runner.addStep(new SequenceCaller(target, method, args, argsFunction));
runner.addStep(new SequenceWaiter(target,
ThreadStateEvent.THREAD_STATE, timeout));
runner.addAssertHandler(assertHandler, null);
return runner;
}
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [FlexUnit] More than 1 SequenceRunner.addAssertHandler ?
> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:43:05 +0100
>
> Well, it seems the answer is to create more SequenceRunner :P
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [FlexUnit] More than 1 SequenceRunner.addAssertHandler ?
> > Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:23:10 +0100
> >
> > I meant,
> > It looks like it uses the first addAssertHandler in both cases.
> > Frédéric THOMAS
> >
> > > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > > Subject: [FlexUnit] More than 1 SequenceRunner.addAssertHandler ?
> > > Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:18:27 +0100
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to use the SequenceRunner for the first time and facing a
> > > problem, it seems I can't have more than one addAssertHandler by
> > > SequenceRunner:
> > >
> > > It looks like it uses the last addAssertHandler in both cases.
> > >
> > > [Test(async, description="Verify the Thread State sequence
> > > New->Running->Terminated")]
> > > public function testNewToRunningToTerminate():void {
> > > testStateNew();
> > >
> > > const runner:SequenceRunner = new SequenceRunner(this);
> > >
> > > runner.addStep(new SequenceCaller(_thread, _thread.start));
> > > runner.addStep(new SequenceWaiter(_thread,
> > > ThreadStateEvent.THREAD_STATE, 2000));
> > >
> > > // If I comment this one, everything works as expected.
> > > runner.addAssertHandler(thread_stateRunning, null);
> > >
> > > runner.addStep(new SequenceWaiter(_thread,
> > > ThreadResultEvent.RESULT, 2000));
> > >
> > > runner.addStep(new SequenceCaller(_thread, _thread.terminate));
> > > runner.addStep(new SequenceWaiter(_thread,
> > > ThreadStateEvent.THREAD_STATE, 2000));
> > > runner.addAssertHandler(thread_stateTerminate, null);
> > >
> > > runner.run();
> > > }
> > >
> > > private function thread_stateRunning(e:ThreadStateEvent,
> > > passThroughData:Object = null):void {
> > > testStateRunning();
> > > }
> > >
> > > private function thread_stateTerminate(e:ThreadStateEvent,
> > > passThroughData:Object = null):void {
> > > testStateTerminated();
> > > }
> > >
> > > What did I miss ?
> > > How can I manage that ?
> > >
> > > Frédéric THOMAS
> >
>
