I'd go with option 1, as I think Alex's arguments are based on the text and spirit of Apache's own documentation and legal advise, but since that would keep this endless (and as it turns out unnecessary) discussion alive, I suggest we go with option 2. Justin obviously won't give up on this, nor will he change his mind, not even when presented with what are to me pretty convincing arguments, so let's give him this "win" and move on.
EdB On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > This crossed paths with my other reply. I do not think we should go with > #2, but if you and Justin feel this is the right thing to do, then that's > what we'll do. I'm out of time for tonight, but will start on prepping > Rcs with #2 tomorrow. > > -Alex > > On 6/25/14 11:32 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Alex, if you don't have an objection to #2, let's go with that? > > > >Thanks, > >Om > >On Jun 25, 2014 11:16 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 6/25/14 11:07 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > >> > >> >Hi, > >> > > >> >+1 for 2 as : > >> >- that's easy to do > >> >- complies with legal requirements re acknowledging copyright (which > >>are > >> >in addition to the license terms in some locations) > >> I do not believe the legal-discuss folks agree that there is a legal > >> requirement, otherwise they would require us to change LICENSE and > >>NOTICE > >> which they have not. > >> > >> >- is in an obvious place for users to see > >> >- there is precedence in other projects > >> > > >> >Justin > >> > > >> > >> > > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
