Thanks Mark. Actually, I think I am going to cancel this RC and the FlexJS RC and make new ones with Erik's latest upgrades to the most recent GCC and GCL.
-Alex On 6/26/14 3:49 PM, "Mark Kessler" <kesslerconsult...@gmail.com> wrote: >+1 > > > >-Mark > > >On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> This is vote for the second (0.0.2) release of the FalconJX (and Falcon) >> compilers. I am not proposing a separate Falcon-only release package at >> this time. The only purpose of the FalconJX packages are to serve as >> upstream packages for the FlexJS release. >> >> The release candidate can be found here; >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/falcon/0.0.2/rc2/ >> >> Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF requirements >>on >> approving a release?", at: >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release >> >> At a minimum you would be expected to check that: >> - MD5 and signed packages are correct >> - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine >> - As this is the first release please carefully check the LICENSE and >> NOTICE files >> - That the build script completes successfully >> - That you can compile using the results of building the source package >> >> The source package is set up the same way as the repo. This means that >> the results of the build are not the same as the binary package. The >> compiled source package can be used to build FlexJS apps via the command >> line and Ant, but not in Flash Builder or other IDEs. I tested the >>source >> package by building it, then pointing to it from the source package of >>the >> FlexJS release candidate and building the examples in the FlexJS >>package. >> >> The binary package is set up as an upstream package for the FlexJS >> release. The most convenient way to use the binary package is to >>install >> a FlexJS SDK via Ant or the Installer. >> >> Please vote to approve this release: >> +1 Approve the release >> -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments to why) >> >> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called. >> >> The vote passes if there is: >> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC >> - More positive votes than negative votes >> >> Remember that this is an initial 'alpha-quality' release so I expect >>there >> will be many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix >>bugs >> in the RC, but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough >> functionality that folks will have some success trying to use it. >> >> People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release >>and >> vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how >>the >> PMC votes. >> >> When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR >> version you tested FlexUnit with. >> >> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread >>not >> this VOTE thread. >> >> For your convenience there is an ant script that automates the common >> steps to validate a >> release. Instead of individually downloading the package and signature >> files, unzipping, etc, you can instead: >> 1) create an empty folder, >> 2) download into that folder this file: >> >>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/falcon/0.0.2/rc2/ApproveFalco >>n. >> xml >> 3) run the script: ant -e -f ApproveFalcon.xml -Drelease.version=0.0.2 >> -Drc=2 >> >> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the >>packages >> and build results are always encouraged. >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> >>
