Hmm. You don't need to overlay anything if you aren't using an IDE. That's why we can run all these ant scripts.
To use an IDE, you need to overlay Falcon in order for the IDE to use Falcon instead of MXMLC. I've never tried to get FB to use FalconJX instead of MXMLC. It would probably be a chunk of work, mirroring the work I did in flex-oem-compiler.jar. In FlexJS today, FalconJX isn't overlaid because it is launched from a launch config and in that case, you should only need to launch the right MXMLJSC.jar and if all the other jars are in the right place, it should just work. For other IDEs, I believe they launch MXMLC directly so you have a better chance of figuring out how to point to MXMLJSC instead. Maybe try renaming. Now if FalconJX is set up correctly and is asked to link current Flex SDK swcs, there could be errors like the one you reported. I've never bothered to try it since I've only been focused on getting FalconJX to compile with the FlexJSUI.SWC. This error looks like an issue with the codegen for an embedded asset. The FlexJSUI.SWC doesn't have embedded assets since I don't think there is embedding on the JS side. So I think this may be just one of the many cross-compiling issues VJS will need to address that FlexJS simply avoids. It might be that you are in fact set up correctly. -Alex On 7/10/14 8:39 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >Alex, > >I tried to get FalconJX to work from this release. I couldn't. Best I >could >do, after running 'ant' on compiler.jx, was where I get the messages like >this one: "CSS codegen problem. Reason: 'Unable to find compilation unit >for Embed(source="Assets.swf",symbol="mx.skins.cursor.DragLink")." A >search >in the archive showed me one email from you to Justin explaining FalconJX >needs to live in a 'proper' SDK, so I messed about with that. Couldn't get >it to work... > >Can you please explain how to overlay FalconJX over a regular SDK, so I >can >use it to compile JS projects without using the installer and needing to >continually copy newly build compilers? > >Thanks, > >EdB > > > >On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> This is the discussion thread. >> >> The changes in this RC are in the installer downloading Google Closure >> Library from GH via the sdk-installer-config.xml file, and a change to >>all >> view beads to allow the view to dictate the default height of the >> component. We used to just rely on the DisplayObject bounding box, but >> that didn't work for TextFields with autosize=true and no text. >> >> Votes will carry over here, but it would be good for a few folks to try >> build and run DataBindingTest or their own projects. >> >> -Alex >> >> > > >-- >Ix Multimedia Software > >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >3521 VB Utrecht > >T. 06-51952295 >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
