Just curious, how is this related to Jose Barragan's work on the
flex-falcon maven branch [1]?

Thanks,
Om

[1]
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/repo?p=flex-falcon.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/maven


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
wrote:

> I think the problem with this is that nobody is maintaining FlashBuilder
> anymore, so if we want to switch the Compiler, we have to trick it into
> beleaving it's the old compiler.
> I bet the IntelliJ guys would take about 5 minutes to implement support
> for both compilers at the same time, but as long as we can't change the
> FlashBuilder this seems to be the best solution.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. Juli 2014 19:25
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Mavenizing Falcon
>
> Ideally, we would have both the 'old compiler' and Falcon in the normal
> SDK. This would, I think, benefit all three projects - yours, FlexJS/VF2JS
> and the normal SDK itself (the latter because it would help start the
> transition from 'old' to 'new'.
>
> EdB
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Christofer Dutz <
> christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
>
> > Just forgot to ask,
> >
> > Another question ... when using Falcon, is there any difference in the
> > Framework part? Are the swcs the same as in the normal SDK? If yes, what
> > exactly is different?
> >
> > At least this would be what I am currently expecting. I know I will have
> > to reference other things when starting to use FlexJS, but at the moment
> I
> > just want to have my application compiled using the new Compiler.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. Juli 2014 17:54
> > An: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: Mavenizing Falcon
> >
> > Gordon or Darrell might know the real answer.
> >
> > If you build the Falcon repo or unpack a binary package, you should see a
> > compiler/lib folder.  In it are the external dependencies require by the
> > build.  Antlr, Commons-io, Commons-cli, guava, Jburg, Jflex, LZMA.
> >
> > Pretty sure Jburg is need to build, but not to run.  Pretty sure
> > Commons-io and Commons-cli is need to run as well as LZMA.
> >
> > Not sure about Antr and Jflex.  Might only be build tools.
> >
> > In generated/dist/sdk/lib are the jars that result from the build.  They
> > are:
> > Compiler.jar
> > Falcon-asc.jar
> > Falcon-compc.jar
> > Falcon-mxmlc.jar
> > Falcon-optimizer.jar
> > Falcon-swfdump.jar
> > Flex-oem-compiler.jar
> >
> > Pretty sure you want the first 5, although really, I think falcon-asc,
> > falcon-compc, falcon-mxmlc use call compiler.jar.  Not sure how the
> > optimizer works.  The 5 jars can be moved into a lib folder with the
> > compiler/lib jars so they are all in one place.
> >
> > You don't need falcon-swfdump unless you want to dump SWFs, and
> > flex-oem-compiler.jar is only for FB integration.
> >
> > AFAIK, these jars do not have dependencies on the current Flex SDK.  When
> > we build up an overlaid SDK we move the current SDK compiler to a
> > bin-legacy and lib-legacy folder, but that's just so folks can revert
> back
> > if Falcon isn't working.  Also, the old SWFDump is much better, IMO.
> >
> > HTH
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 7/13/14 7:42 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >After my latest Mavenizer and Flexmojos changes seem to compile all of
> > >my Flex projects without problems, I wanted to get started on adding
> > >Falcon support.
> > >Now instead of re-deploying the entire compiler, I would much more like
> > >to have the falcon-compiler depend on the normal compiler by
> > >referencing the falcon libs and adding a dependency on the normal
> > >compiler artifact and exclude the old compiler libs.
> > >
> > >Could someone here on the list please describe me exactly which libs
> > >Falcon consists of and where I can get them from as well as which libs
> > >in the classic sdk are needed? I think being able to switch the
> > >compilers by changing a dependency in maven would make experimenting a
> > lot easier.
> > >
> > >Chris
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>

Reply via email to