Saw it! Thanks. Looks like mustella on our CI hung before your changes so I'm going to reboot the server now and we'll see if it passes.
Thanks, -Alex On 8/20/14 7:46 AM, "Darrell Loverin" <darrell.love...@gmail.com> wrote: >I recommitted the mustella changes to allow the test directory to be >located outside of the mustella source: > >Branch: refs/heads/develop >Commit: 1f8c801d33406b7f1f6119fe93788f0c30fd5c73 >Committed: Mon Aug 18 21:46:03 2014 -0400 > > > >On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> It passed on my Windows box. If it fails again, download the bad.png >>and >> email it to me off-list. >> >> -Alex >> >> On 8/12/14 1:22 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <t...@extravision.com> wrote: >> >> >Well, it certainty seems to have hung again today. >> > >> >Before that AdvancedCSS_descendantSelectors_RuntimeCSS had a bad >>bitmap, >> >but the two files look the same to me : >> > >> > >> >>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests >>/ >> >>>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda >>>nt >> >Selector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss.png >> > >> >>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests >>/ >> >>>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda >>>nt >> >selector_basic_nomatch_style_runtime...@win.png >> > >> >>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests >>/ >> >>>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda >>>nt >> >selector_basic_nomatch_style_runtime...@win.png.bad.png >> > >> >I've not seen the '@win' on the end before. Should I copy the >> >...@win.png.bad.png over the top of ...@win.png or over >>...runtimecss.png >> >? >> > >> >Tom >> > >> >On 11/08/14 22:01, Darrell Loverin wrote: >> >> I've been using mustella to test my own components. I modified >>mustella >> >>so >> >> the tests do not have to be created in the tests directory. >> >> >> >> I fixed the problem that caused me to revert the changes some time >>ago. >> >> I've been waiting for a clean run of mustella before I commit the >> >>changes >> >> again. I haven't seen a clean mustella run in a very long time. >> >> >> >> >> >> -Darrell >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Yes, you can try using it if you want. >> >>> >> >>> Darrell was trying to make it easier to run tests outside of the >> >>>mustella >> >>> folder, but it broke something and he stopped trying. We use parts >>of >> >>> Mustella to run tests as part of the checkintests so I know it can >> >>>work, >> >>> and FlexJS uses mustella as well. >> >>> >> >>> -Alex >> >>> >> >>> On 8/11/14 9:39 AM, "Mihai Chira" <mihai.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> There is a comment on the mustella overview page[1] that asks "Is >>this >> >>>> just for testing the SDK, or can I also use it to test my own >> >>>> applications?" >> >>>> >> >>>> I'd like to ask the same - or if it can be adapted to testing >>existing >> >>>> applications. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks, >> >>>> Mihai >> >>>> >> >>>> [1] >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Mustella+Overview >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>______________________________________________________________________ >> >> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud >> >>service. >> >> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com >> >> >>______________________________________________________________________ >> > >> >>
