> >Either way, if they have been available, unrestricted, for a prolonged
> >period, without Adobe actively contesting the right of Velo - or anyone
> >else - to distribute them, then they are de facto in the public domain.

Hey, I thought you didn't like this legal stuff ;-).  I'm not saying you
> are wrong, but how long is the "prolonged period"?  Also, wouldn't this be
> like a movie script where someone steals some artwork and displays it in a
> public but remote gallery for a "prolonged period" then claims it is
> public domain?
>

As I’m PMC again, it is my interpretation of the Apache Way that I have to
“like” it. As long as we keep it brief ;-)

The name Velo came up, so it’s safe to say that it’s been many years. And
the internet is not a "remote gallery” (but I like your analogy, it’s a
clever trick ;-)). They have been freely available to the only interested
audience, so it’s fair to conclude that the entire public has had access
for a long time -> public domain.

EdB



-- 
Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Reply via email to