I've checked in the changes into the apache-tour-de-flex-1.2 branch. Can someone take a look at the changes?
I have kicked off a build here: http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-utilities_tour-de-flex-release/10/console The new version is (should be) available here. You will need to clear your browser cache first: http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-utilities_tour-de-flex-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/TourDeFlex/TourDeFlex3/src/index.html Feedback welcome. Thanks, Om On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Jake Knerr <j...@ardisialabs.com> wrote: > > How's this? > > link:http://www.ardisialabs.com/tourDeFlex/tour-de-flex.jpg > > Image is also attached. > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:43 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks Jake. I linked to the image url you and tested the app. It looks too tiny. It is a 400x400 image. We probably need a 800x800 for it to look nice and readable. Also, a line of text in the image would probably work. >> >> Thanks, >> Om >> >> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Jake Knerr <j...@ardisialabs.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi OmPrakash, >>> >>> Sounds like the image is the only thing the end-user will see. Should I add the textual description directly to the image, or will there be a Label with the description. >>> >>> If you can add the textual description via a Flex text component, then here is the image you can use: http://www.ardisialabs.com/tourDeFlex/tour-de-flex.jpg >>> >>> If there is no textual description, please let me know and I'll fire up my trusty Fireworks graphics editor and add some text to the image. At the minimum the image should have "Click To Open" on it. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> - Jake >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:02 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala < bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> (CC-ing Flexicious and Jake@Ardisia) >>>> >>>> I have a fix ready to be checked in that uses an image and a click event to take the user to a third party demo page. From my FB debug console, I don't see any securitydomain exceptions when I do this. Whereas, with loading a swf, I get a securitydomain error. >>>> >>>> Jake, can you send me a link to a jpg image you want to use? I will use the link:http://www.ardisialabs.com/tour-de-flex >>>> >>>> Sal, do you want to do the same, please? >>>> >>>> Let's see if this works. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Om >>>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Jake Knerr <j...@ardisialabs.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I am one of the third-parties, the "Ardisia Component Library". Sorry >>>>> about not responding earlier, I just read the thread. >>>>> >>>>> I am thrilled to be included in the Tour De Flex, so first off thanks for >>>>> including this new feature. I tried building the TourDeFlex with the >>>>> nightly build from earlier in the thread but I was hit with 100 or so >>>>> compile errors with path errors and pointers to non-existent components >>>>> like a Spark RichTextEditor so I must be using an incorrect build. >>>>> However, earlier in this thread OmPrakash posted screenshots of the problem >>>>> and I looked at the nightly binary build so I have an idea of the layout >>>>> issues are. >>>>> >>>>> I hate to cause all this trouble . Perhaps my page in the Tour De Flex >>>>> could just be a label and a link? >>>>> >>>>> - Jake >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Jake Knerr <j...@ardisialabs.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> > I am one of the third-parties, the "Ardisia Component Library". Sorry >>>>> > about not responding earlier, I just read the thread. >>>>> > >>>>> > I am thrilled to be included in the Tour De Flex, so first off thanks for >>>>> > including this new feature. I tried building the TourDeFlex with the >>>>> > nightly build from earlier in the thread but I was hit with 100 or so >>>>> > compiling errors with path errors and pointers to non-existent components >>>>> > like a Spark RichTextEditor so I must be using an incorrect build. >>>>> > However, earlier in this thread OmPrakash posted screenshots of the problem >>>>> > and I looked at the nightly binary build so I have an idea of the layout >>>>> > issues are. >>>>> > >>>>> > I hate to cause all this trouble . Perhaps my page in the Tour De Flex >>>>> > could just be a label and a link? >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Say something like what I have now, except go ahead and drop the imagehave >>>>> > a single page with a list of third party components arranged in a grid >>>>> > format with a short description of each and a link to the demo. This way, >>>>> > it could be compiled into the app with minimal effort and >>>>> > >>>>> > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On 11/7/14, 12:34 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >So how do we reach consensus on this in a timely way? If the process >>>>> >> >doesn't allow a vote and/or people don't vote it's basically dead in the >>>>> >> >water. I would like to see this released sooner than later and not have >>>>> >> >releases hanging for weeks, not everyone is full time on this project and >>>>> >> >increasing the length of the release process stops people from being able >>>>> >> >to be a release manager. If we had stuck to the official recommend >>>>> >> >process we probably would of released by now. The previous version of >>>>> >> >Tour De Flex had two release candidates and was released in 10 days from >>>>> >> >start of the first RC vote to the final vote result. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Sometimes, releases get stuck on hard issues discovered late in the game. >>>>> >> It is clear you want to ship as-is, but I think we should make the >>>>> >> third-party content look good. I was hoping the third parties would have >>>>> >> offered their thoughts by now. I’m wondering if they’ve at least tried >>>>> >> the nightly build at [1] and saw how their content appears, because that’s >>>>> >> how it will behave when published to flex.a.o. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Also, have you investigated the Squiggly issue brought up yesterday [2]? >>>>> >> I also get the exception. It could just be a bug in the CI server setup. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Both Squiggly and Third Party examples are highlighted in the >>>>> >> RELEASE_NOTES and both are not fully operational. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >It's also curious as to why you only decide to bring this content load >>>>> >> >strategy up now and state it as a blocker for releasing, rather than when >>>>> >> >we we were discussing adding 3rd party support for it several months ago. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> It never crossed my mind until I saw the issue brought up on this thread. >>>>> >> If we had established Jenkins builds sooner, then maybe we would have >>>>> >> found it sooner, because it was only when I saw it that I realized what >>>>> >> was going on, and only after thinking about it more did it occur to me >>>>> >> that we really should get Marshall Plan separation from the third parties. >>>>> >> If we can’t engage them on this sizing/position issue, we probably don’t >>>>> >> want to depend on them staying in sync on SDK versions going forward. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> -Alex >>>>> >> >>>>> >> [1]http://s.apache.org/sC4 >>>>> >> [2]http://s.apache.org/hqe >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Jake Knerr - Flex Developer >>>>> > Ardisia Labs >>>>> >www.ardisialabs.com >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jake Knerr - Flex Developer >>>>> Ardisia Labs >>>>>www.ardisialabs.com >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jake Knerr - Flex Developer >>> Ardisia Labs >>>www.ardisialabs.com >> >> > > > > -- > Jake Knerr - Flex Developer > Ardisia Labs >www.ardisialabs.com
