Nope. You lost me completely. Shall I revert and leave it to the experts? Or can you tell me what to change, without explaining why, please?
EdB On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 11/19/14, 11:35 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > >I followed some of the other 'external' licenses, which have a copy of the > >license in LICENSE (with a sentence explaining to what it applies) and the > >original copy right claims of the authors in NOTICE (with a mention of the > >applicable license). I have just committed my changes, feel free to review > >those. > > I did look. My understanding of the rules is that some licenses tell the > author to add their copyright to the license text, and in those cases, I > think we’re not supposed to modify the license text to separate out the > copyrights into the NOTICE file. Instead, just use a pointer in LICENSE > (i.e., tell folks where to find the third-party license file) which is how > I’d told the FlatSpark folks to do it, or copy the whole third-party > license with the copyrights into LICENSE which is sort of what happened in > Squiggly. > > It is the Apache policy that has us move copyrights for donated code to > NOTICE. > > And in the case where the license requires attribution but no attribution > is in the LICENSE like the CameronMusic sound, we mentioned the creator in > the NOTICE. > > -Alex > > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
