Limpid, thanks :-)
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - The link was
> pointing to an old version of the .jar
> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 20:27:11 +0000
>
>
>
> On 12/1/14, 7:40 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> An official release can't depend on a snapshot
> >Yes it can even though it is not the default.
>
> I suppose for some non-Apache jar we could have it as a dependency, but in
> this case, we own the sources so our official releases should probably use
> an officially released jar. However, it isn’t worth debating at this time.
>
> We got here because the flex-sdk build was broken trying to use the
> released jar and using a snapshot was the quickest way to fix it
> temporarily. Then the version of the snapshot I used got wiped out so
> Erik fixed it again in this change with a newer snapshot. It was on my
> list to fix for real if Chris didn’t beat me to it. I recently found that
> Falcon is using the released snapshot and just checked in a change to
> flex-sdk to use the same URL.
>
> -Alex
>
