Understood. Go tweak the wording on the wiki until you’re happy that it reads correctly. I don’t think anyone would have issues with that.
If anyone wants to then tweak it further, great. That’s what wikis are for! ;-) On Dec 3, 2014, at 12:04 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> I don’t think Erik was trying to be so precise with his wording. > > I just want to make sure we're not trying to introduce consensus for releases > via this new process. It really needs to be made clear that releases are by > majority approval only (ie 3+1 more +1s than -1s) not consensus (3 +1s and a > -1 is a veto). The wording as it is currently reads to me that a "blocker" is > basically a veto and thus you need consensus before making a release > candidate, that's against Apache policy and we can't have a release process > that does that. > > Thanks, > Justin
