FTR, I checked the archives. I only found that FB didn’t like versions < 4. No idea what will happen if we try 5, 2015, etc.
On 12/9/14, 11:04 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <[email protected]> wrote: >I think for this version, we should stick to being in the 4.x numbering >scheme. We don't really have that many changes to warrant a major release >(although we do have some pretty nice changes that I'm excited to see >published!) +1 > >That being said -- I wonder what people's opinions are for what >(obtainable) goals we could make so we can make a 5.0 release. I think >it's about due, and it would generate press and mindshare coming up with a >major release. I think we have a LOT of changes that we've made since the >4.6 release from Adobe, and pushing out a major release would help us >break >away from the "just maintaining Adobe's software" mentality that I've been >seeing out in the industry. IMO, FlexJS will help us break away from the “maintaining Adobe” mentality because it also removes the dependency on the Adobe runtimes. I don’t currently envision calling FlexJS "Flex 5". IMO, one possible definition of Flex 5 could be adding enough new Spark components that folks don’t need to fall back to MX anymore. -Alex
