I have added a link to the wiki page for Promises. I found this link [1] for FlatSpark usage. Can we add this to the RELEASE_NOTES? Or is Mahmoud planning on a new wiki page?
It would be nice to have a wiki page for the TLF Tables as well. Harbs, any chance you can get something like that up? Thanks, Om [1] https://github.com/akamud/FlatSpark/wiki/How-to-use-FlatSpark-in-your-project On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > The README needs a bit about Java (1.)8 and the RELEASE_NOTES will be > updated with any fixed JIRA tickets, but that's about it. I'd > appreciate it if you could take a look at them. > > Thanks, > > EdB > > > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > I’m ok with LICENSE and NOTICE. I haven’t reviewed README/RELEASE_NOTES > > since they are still being worked on. I don’t know how to review > > CONTRIBUTORS, but I would imagine some of our new testers need to go in > it. > > > > -Alex > > > > On 12/19/14, 1:04 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > > >>So, the nice quiet on this thread means everyone is OK with the > >>current state of the legal docs? > >> > >>EdB > >> > >> > >> > >>On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 12/10/14, 11:25 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > >>> > >>>>Alex, did BlazeDS integration fully land, as far as the docs are > >>>>concerned? > >>> > >>> It seems to be working for me. It could use more testing. It would be > >>> great if someone took the nightly and tried to follow the README to > >>>build > >>> the source package. > >>> > >>> Should we mention that we removed the need to download the one BlazeDS > >>>jar > >>> in the RELEASE_NOTES? > >>> > >>> I think I found a error in LICENSE. I think the MPL shouldn’t be in > >>> LICENSE. I could not find any MPL files in the source package (and > >>>there > >>> shouldn’t be because it is category B and only binaries can be MPL). > >>>So, > >>> I am about to pull that out unless someone can explain why it should > >>>still > >>> be in there. I kept thinking it had to do with OSMF, but OSMF isn’t in > >>> the source package either, and there is a sentence at the beginning > >>>saying > >>> it applies to most of the directories. In looking at Git/SVN history, > my > >>> current thinking is that we added it for 4.8 when we had some > >>> to-be-donated Adobe source in the package, but now I think everything > >>>has > >>> been donated. > >>> > >>> Meanwhile, I’m working on putting the OFL license acceptance into the > >>> install scripts, but I have to stop for now. > >>> > >>> -Alex > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >>-- > >>Ix Multimedia Software > >> > >>Jan Luykenstraat 27 > >>3521 VB Utrecht > >> > >>T. 06-51952295 > >>I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl >
