And no body is going to die if it's (still) wrong despite what looks
like heroic efforts over the Christmas break.
We can always amend it again in future if we notice anything.
Maybe you need to repost or bump the vote thread, because I know I've
just marked everything read as of yesterday when I got back to work.
I think other people may also do similar at the start of a new year.
December seems a long time ago !
Tom
On 05/01/15 18:48, Harbs wrote:
My eyes kind of glazed over at the beginning of the discussion, so I’m kind of
with Erik on this…
On Jan 5, 2015, at 8:33 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
FWIW, in case anybody is actually still following this thread, IMO, we
need at least one more PMC member who plans to vote on this release to
review these changes. That’s a reason behind the requirement of 3 +1
votes, that 3 sets of eyes are better than 1 or 2. We need more PMC
members to understand these rules.
I really hope I'm wrong, but I think everyone else is as lost as I am.
Unless one of you (Alex & Justin) writes a summary of the changes and
the 'why' of them, in TL;DR style, I'm afraid the other voting
contributors will - out of necessity, because we just don't grok -
vote +1 on your word (at least, with regard to these legal changes).
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
