>> Are you intentionally trying to misrepresent the 'less-RC' process? > > Of course not, but we need as many RC as we need to get it right. The aim is > fewer RCs and while the idea number would be one that's IMO going to be hard > to achieve in practise. For whatever reason people only check in detail when > it matters ie when we have an RC to vote on.
You are wrong. Intentionally or not, you're misrepresenting the 'less-RC' process. 'less-RC' is about testing BEFORE an RC is cut. You're still - against PMC consensus - advocating the old release process. I can only repeat myself so many times, so I'm out of this discussion. EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
