About JS frameworks, The only option I've been looking recently that makes
make think "this could be something like flex" (but it's not today), is
Google Dart + Polymer Dart. I think Dart is a cool technology and seems
google is pushing it, but in the background behind AngularJS. But there's
OOP, classes, development without (that's one of the coolest features).
Here's a PDF about it if you're interested:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/8496144/dart-and-web-components-javazone-2013.pdf

The weak part is the state of Polymer Dart as a web component standard
implementation I think they need get a bit far. (For example, for what I
see, there's no a list component like in Flex, and If you want to select an
item, you need to manualy refresh the drawing of the list and manage all
the internal things. I see a friend of mine implementing a polymer
component set ala Flex style in this technology and he's getting something
cool between the two worlds, but again a single person effort that doesn't
follow a global and trending path in this nightmare we are living this
days, without doubt, for me, the darkest hours of web development era).

I think FlexJS has it own reason to live and could be a great option for
people out there, but it need a muscle and union of mind that we don't have
today. So it's difficult. It would need real investment of resources and
some top companies pushing it forward. I don't think in Adobe, since it's
not anymore the kind of company it used to be, and nowadays for me does not
have any interest at all, at least for me.

We have a marketing problem? for sure, but it's difficult in the actual
state of the art make people join the technology. I think it could happen
eventually near a 1.0, as technology could make several kind of things.
Maybe this cool FlexJS technology could be rebranded or live outside the
Flex ecosystem and be revamped so people could see it as something new and
fresh.

If you ask me about what to spend the time...well, my vote is for FlexJS,
since it's the future and Flex (traditional) is enough robust and always
will have issues to spend time and fix, but FlexJS is a baby that is in
incubation and could not survive without intervention.

Best,

Carlos


2015-03-18 5:49 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>:

>
>
> On 3/17/15, 8:19 PM, "kevin.godell" <kevin.god...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >When the 4.14.1 RC became available, I noticed that the 4.15 nightly is no
> >longer available in the windows apache flex installer. Is that the way it
> >is
> >supposed to work? Is 4.14.1 made from the nightly? Forgive my ignorance,
> >but
> >I am trying to follow along and stay up to date with the latest
> >developments.
>
> Yes 4.14.1 == nightly.  They nightly build is built off the develop branch
> instead of a release branch so it can sometimes contain a change we don’t
> want in the the next release, but most of the time all changes are in both
> branches.
>
> -Alex
>
>


-- 

Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es


Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.

De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Tres Creus, nº 104, 2-1, 08202 de Sabadell (Barcelona) con la
documentación necesaria.

Reply via email to