Argh ... sorry for the early VOTE thread ... forgott about that. Will try to do it right next time.
Regarding the "tukaani" package. It's a dependency of the apache-commons compress library. I doubt there should be any problems with it. Probably I could even try to exclude it if this is nessecary. But on the Apache Commons page it says it's Public Domain (http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-compress/dependencies.html) Chris -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. April 2015 08:33 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex Mavenizer 1.0.0 Hi Chris, Looks pretty good. IMO, in the new release process you would not have started a vote thread until we got a chance to pick through the source package. Then I’d be more tempted to fix minor stuff in the README and other docs. Once a vote is under way I’m less likely to do so. Anyway, the only question I have is about the use of the tukaani package. The licensing says that some parts of it are under GNU licenses. Can I assume we aren’t using those parts? Other than that, I’ll try to actually run it tomorrow or Monday, then I’m good to go. -Alex On 4/4/15, 9:48 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >This is the discussion thread to the Apache Flex Mavenizer 1.0.0 vote >thread. > > >Chris
