Don't worry about it. I just have been trying to estimate time as well and currently, its to much right now to be helpful with anything.
I just have to stick with Feathers and AIR right now on the GPU. Mike On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Fred, are you interested in FlexJS/this type of dev? I mean, if there was > another person on board that knew what was going on with this stuff and say > IntelliJ, it would be a lot more appealing to me to try and find some dev > time for it. It's such a shame all the work we put into this stuff Fred. > > > No, not really interested to spend a lot of time on it, the main technical > reason is the current limitations of the compiler but if people think it > could be a useful, I can check if the plugin still works with the last > version of IJ and what it would cost to update it as it could certainly be > used for FlexJS > > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:37:47 -0400 > > Subject: Re: AW: [FlexJS] More SWCs > > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > > Don't hesitate to correct or complete me Mike, that's a long time. > > > > Correct Fred. > > > > Fred, are you interested in FlexJS/this type of dev? I mean, if there was > > another person on board that knew what was going on with this stuff and > say > > IntelliJ, it would be a lot more appealing to me to try and find some dev > > time for it. It's such a shame all the work we put into this stuff Fred. > > > > Alex, you know how I said I couldn't really justify doing this little > hobby > > if I didn't have a project. Well, in the last week I put together this in > > Feathers/AIR using UDP communication to talk to Bitiwg; > > > > http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=259&t=435857 > > > > It seems that is Javascript can send UDP messages, this might actually be > > an excuse for me to contribute to this project. Being able to create an > > application with FlexJS that would do the same thing as the app I just > > made, but the UI mad in HTML. I am using OSC UPD messages, so it's not > like > > that app has to be native if Javascript could communicate that way. > > > > I admit, javascript and I are not best friends but I could see that as > > being me test project. > > > > So Fred, where are you at these days? > > > > Mike > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Frédéric THOMAS < > webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Alex, > > > > > > The SWCs format as it is today could be read not only by the compiler > but > > > amongs the tools, the IDEs, extending the existing structure seems > fine but > > > introducing a new one could break them, in RBL, we can have the SWC, > the > > > AS sources, the JS classes, 1 all classes JS and the minified JS too > IIRC > > > managed by container / categories and the compiler knows how to deal > with > > > each of them individually and we have also the version of the RBL / > > > compiler it can be used with. > > > > > > Don't hesitate to correct or complete me Mike, that's a long time. > > > > > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > > > From: aha...@adobe.com > > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: AW: [FlexJS] More SWCs > > > > Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:32:16 +0000 > > > > > > > > Mike, Fred, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the info. Sounds like you did something more complex than > > > what > > > > I’m thinking, or maybe I’m not considering something. I sure hope it > > > > doesn’t take me 4 months. What were the difficult parts of doing > this? > > > > > > > > You can already stick files in a SWC. They are just zip archives. > I was > > > > just going to have COMPJSC open the SWC, jam the folder of js files > it > > > > created into the SWC and update the catalog.xml. MXMLJSC would open > the > > > > SWCs and deploy the JS files to the js-debug output folder. > > > > > > > > I’ll definitely take a closer look at the Randori Bundle code when I > > > > actually get around to this. > > > > > > > > Thanks again, > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 4/10/15, 6:17 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >Fred, haha I was JUST ABOUT TO POST THAT LINK! Wow weird! :) > > > > > > > > > >On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Frédéric THOMAS < > > > webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Alex, > > > > >> > > > > >> Thinking about it, if your goal is to pack up JS and SWCs files > > > together > > > > >> in a resource bundle file and make the compiler to read it, I > guess > > > > >>most of > > > > >> this work as been done already around the concept of Resource > Bundle > > > > >> Library (.rbl files) in Randori [1], if this matches your needs, I > > > don't > > > > >> think it is hard to pick up. > > > > >> > > > > >> Frédéric THOMAS > > > > >> > > > > >> [1] > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > https://github.com/RandoriAS/randori-compiler/tree/develop/src/test/java/ > > > > >>randori/compiler/bundle > > > > >> > > > > >> > From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de > > > > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > >> > Subject: AW: [FlexJS] More SWCs > > > > >> > Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 07:02:24 +0000 > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Hi Alex, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I was hoping to finish my other stuff sooner and then be able to > > > > >>assist > > > > >> you with this. > > > > >> > As I don't know how long I need to fix one bug in Flexmojos I > > > stumbled > > > > >> over yesterday, I'll write up my whishlist ;-) > > > > >> > > > > > >> > It would be great if a FlexJS archive would contain both the > > > > >> flash-related classes as well as the matching js portions > (eventually > > > > >>in a > > > > >> directory "js") so I can change Flexmojos to unpack all "js/**" > stuff > > > > >>to a > > > > >> local directory and use that for compiling. Currently I have to > add > > > the > > > > >>swc > > > > >> deps normally and add the big fat js-resources archive as a > compiler > > > > >> dependency. Bringing both together would be a MAJOR benefit for > all > > > > >> "(Better) IDE support" issues out there ;-) > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Chris > > > > >> > > > > > >> > ________________________________________ > > > > >> > Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> > > > > >> > Gesendet: Freitag, 10. April 2015 08:05 > > > > >> > An: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > >> > Betreff: [FlexJS] More SWCs > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Hi, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > As I mentioned in “The Big Rename”, I’m thinking of creating > more > > > > >>SWCs. > > > > >> > As I started in on it, it occurred to me that after this > > > refactoring, > > > > >>my > > > > >> > next goal is to try to see if we can pack the JS files into a > SWC so > > > > >>the > > > > >> > SWC becomes the single deliverable for a library. Doing so > > > simplifies > > > > >> the > > > > >> > command-line syntax so it is the same for both AS and JS, and I > > > think > > > > >>it > > > > >> > makes it easier for Maven to work with FlexJS SWCs. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > But the question that I came up with is, if we do pack JS in the > > > SWCs: > > > > >> how > > > > >> > many SWCs should there be? For example, right now, for charts, > some > > > > >>of > > > > >> > the charts code is in the FlexJSUI SWC and thus has handwritten > JS, > > > > >>and a > > > > >> > bunch more code is in the FlexJSJX SWC and the JS is generated > by > > > > >> > cross-compiling the AS. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > The easiest thing to do right now is simply carve the chart > files > > > from > > > > >> > FlexJSJX into a SWC and the other chart files from FlexJSUI into > > > their > > > > >> own > > > > >> > SWC, but then you have the charting code divided between two > SWCs. > > > > >>Maybe > > > > >> > it is better to try to re-work the build scripts and CompC to > put > > > all > > > > >>the > > > > >> > chart code in one SWC. What do others think? > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Related, we could make lots of small swcs or fewer bigger ones. > > > What > > > > >>do > > > > >> > folks think of that? There could be a SWC for: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > -Effects > > > > >> > -Collections > > > > >> > -Binding > > > > >> > -Graphics > > > > >> > -HTTPService > > > > >> > -Charts > > > > >> > -Mobile > > > > >> > -Formatters > > > > >> > -DragDrop > > > > >> > -Google Maps > > > > >> > -Jquery > > > > >> > -CreateJS > > > > >> > > > > > >> > And, if we actually have two SWCs (one for cross-compiled code, > one > > > > >>for > > > > >> > handwritten JS) that’s a lot of SWCs. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Anyway, let me know your thoughts, but I’m thinking that lots of > > > SWCs > > > > >> > might be the better route. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > -Alex > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
